AI summary & topic connections
The commenter supports HHS evaluation of wireless-radiation experiences and scientific evidence, research priorities, and protection of children and vulnerable populations.
- Research & federal duties: “ther potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for p”
- Children & vulnerable groups: “rrent research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding”
- Environmental effects: “e role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be ad”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.
I am responding as a parent, family member, caregiver, healthcare professional, advocate, and concerned member of the public.
I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.
I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.
Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.