AI summary & topic connections
A parent reports children’s attention, headache, sleep and dizziness problems, opposes a proposed school cell tower, and supports HHS research and reduced school Wi-Fi exposure.
- Children & vulnerable groups: “ something doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. My 4 children struggle with attention, headaches, sleep problems - and most re”
- Neurological symptoms & sleep: “sn’t happening. My 4 children struggle with attention, headaches, sleep problems - and most recently two of my children have been getting dizzy s”
- Towers & siting: “ause of poor reception – the school wants to build a cell tower right on the property. It will be much healthier for the childr”
- Wi-Fi & indoor exposure: “l be much healthier for the children to have limited Wi-Fi access at school rather than have a cell phone tower built right near t”
- Research & federal duties: “ther potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for p”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.
I am responding from the perspective of a [patient, parent, family member, caregiver, healthcare professional, researcher, advocate, concerned member of the public, or other].
HHS should address this issue because it affects the health and safety of the majority of people. Just because you can see something doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. My 4 children struggle with attention, headaches, sleep problems - and most recently two of my children have been getting dizzy spells. I have two other children who go to school – and because of poor reception – the school wants to build a cell tower right on the property. It will be much healthier for the children to have limited Wi-Fi access at school rather than have a cell phone tower built right near the athletic field.
I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.
I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.
Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.