AI summary & topic connections

The commenter reports family symptoms after a nearby tower upgrade, attributes a spouse's lymphoma partly to the tower, describes relocation, and supports HHS research.

  • Towers & siting: “ After living in our home for many years a tower was erected within 100 feet from our backyard. We didn’t love the appearance”
  • Neurological symptoms & sleep: “odified’ the tower and we began experiencing brain fog, fatigue, and just overall unwell. We decided to move away from ”
  • Cancer & tumors: “ to move, My husband was then diagnosed with stage 3 lymphoma at age 50. We definitely believe that the tower contributed to t”
  • Housing, work & access barriers: “igue, and just overall unwell. We decided to move away from that house as we didn’t want our children exposed any longe”
  • Children & vulnerable groups: “ move away from that house as we didn’t want our children exposed any longer. While trying to move, My husband was then diagnosed ”
  • Research & federal duties: “ther potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for p”

Matched review of original text; attachments excluded. Review provenance

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a parent, wife, and concerned individual. After living in our home for many years a tower was erected within 100 feet from our backyard. We didn’t love the appearance but didn’t think too much of it. Then, a while later they ‘modified’ the tower and we began experiencing brain fog, fatigue, and just overall unwell. We decided to move away from that house as we didn’t want our children exposed any longer. While trying to move, My husband was then diagnosed with stage 3 lymphoma at age 50. We definitely believe that the tower contributed to this occurrence. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.