AI summary & topic connections
Requests more independent research and updated wireless safety standards, argues existing agency work is insufficient and acknowledges poor documentation of population effects.
- Research & federal duties: “there needs to be far more research done on this issue”
- Exposure limits & oversight: “update very outdated health standards about the use of 5G technology”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Thanks for soliciting input for this important matter. As a writer and researcher, I have looked into the health effects of EMF on human health for many years. The FCC and HHS in my opinion have not done nearly enough work to ascertain the health effects on human populations. The pervasive increases in the power levels and scope of EMF radiation are likely responsible for many medical problems but overall this remains poorly documented. In addition, there needs to be far more research done on this issue and more acknowledgement of the research that has been done to date such as the WHO’s identification of EMF as a possible carcinogen. I sincerely hope both the FCC and HHS will update very outdated health standards about the use of 5G technology to reflect the current research and place far less emphasis on research that has been sponsored by the wireless industry.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.