AI summary & topic connections
A grandmother raises concerns about children's exposure, protective-product costs, smart meters and cancer accounts, and supports HHS research.
- Children & vulnerable groups: “ects, especially for young children, like my grandchildren. Wi Fi radiation is also a major concern. I have bought EMF prot”
- Smart meters: “hope it works, but it was costly to buy. The smart meters are terrible for home owners because of the constant Wi-Fi going”
- Cancer & tumors: “ isn’t good and how 5G gave college students brain cancer in college because the 5 G towers were aimed at their college ca”
- Research & federal duties: “ther potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for le”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
In response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.
I am a grandmother who is concerned for the public. I’ve long been concerned with EMF radiation effects, especially for young children, like my grandchildren. Wi Fi radiation is also a major concern. I have bought EMF protection for my home and my children’s home. Honestly, I hope it works, but it was costly to buy. The smart meters are terrible for home owners because of the constant Wi-Fi going across the rooms constantly. Watch this documentary and it will show you proof why EMF radiation isn’t good and how 5G gave college students brain cancer in college because the 5 G towers were aimed at their college campus building. They all died and the 5G tower was the only common denominator. I hope their story was on this documentary. I think it was. https://youtu.be/8ZTiT9ZSg3Q?is=h6TnmG-9u4F_CY3U
I’m very concerned about long term exposure especially from the 5G they’re using now.
I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.
HHS needs to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence. Also to identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.
Thank you for letting us voice our opinion.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.