AI summary & topic connections
Describes unsuccessful efforts to change school wireless exposure and a decision to homeschool, and requests informed choice and HHS investigation of risks to children.
- Children & vulnerable groups: “demy of Pediatrics advises parents to “limit children’s screen time and exposure from cell phones and other devices emitting radiati”
- Wi-Fi & indoor exposure: “ills for testing time. There are hazardous wireless routers emitting radiation in every classroom, but most teachers are not”
- Housing, work & access barriers: “fficult decision to protect our children and home school them at our own expense, but this is not an option for most working families, who all de”
- Research & federal duties: “ther potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for pr”
- Cancer & tumors: “with EMFs, RF, and wireless radiation - from brain cancer to infertility to depression, insomnia, addiction, and much more”
- Reproduction & pregnancy: “nd wireless radiation - from brain cancer to infertility to depression, insomnia, addiction, and much more - our family m”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
(….continued from previous Comment, this is Comment to HHS Part 2)
The American Academy of Pediatrics advises parents to “limit children’s screen time and exposure from cell phones and other devices emitting radiation from electromagnetic fields (EMF)”, but teachers in our town have sent home papers assigning the children to spend more time practicing on their wireless devices at home, to better their skills for testing time.
There are hazardous wireless routers emitting radiation in every classroom, but most teachers are not even aware that they shouldn’t stand directly under a wireless router all day, or place an unsuspecting child’s desk directly beside a wireless router for him to absorb maximum radiation exposure every day while attending school.
In meetings with school principals, superintendents, teachers, and the school committee in our town, our family asked them to bring in just one local medical professional willing to attest to the safety of a wireless learning environment for children. They reported back that they did reach out to some local doctors, but none of the doctors who responded were willing to make such a statement on the record. One of the doctors reportedly said to our school Principal, off the record, “I’m not attesting to that. Everyone knows you’re supposed to limit your exposure to radiation.” Even still, in our town’s public schools there is no informed consent notice to be signed, disclosing to parents that their children will be exposed to constant microwave radiation while attending school. When I tell other parents about it, it makes them feel sick - and foolish that they’ve been left unprotected and unaware of such a major cause for concern about health risks present in their children’s learning environment.
Most the educators we met with uncomfortably agreed that there is definitely cause for concern regarding wireless radiation exposure in the schools, but they’ve made no effort to stop the massive rollout of wireless tech – and instead offered us the option to home school our kids as the only way to avoid the serious health risks of cumulative daily radiation exposure at school. I feel strongly that mandatory radiation exposure is not an acceptable requirement for students attending public school!
According to Harvard Medical School/Mass General Hospital’s Martha R. Herbert, Ph.D., M.D., “Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation from WiFi and cell towers can exert a disorganizing effect on the ability to learn and remember, and can also be destabilizing to immune and metabolic function. This will make it harder for some children to learn, particularly those who are already having learning or medical problems in the first place.”
Knowing the terrible risks associated with EMFs, RF, and wireless radiation - from brain cancer to infertility to depression, insomnia, addiction, and much more - our family made the difficult decision to protect our children and home school them at our own expense, but this is not an option for most working families, who all deserve the right to opt out of unwanted radiation exposure - and at least deserve to be protected and informed by responsible authorities on how to minimize risk.
I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.
I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.
Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Sincerely,
A Concerned U.S. Citizen and Mother of Two
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.