AI summary & topic connections
The commenter cites cellular damage, cancer research and fire-department objections to antennas as reasons for stronger public protection.
- Cancer & tumors: “ the human body can sustain due to exposure, increased cancer risk after repeated exposure, and as evidenced by many fire departmen”
- Proposed biological mechanisms: “oven by scientific studies demonstrating the cellular damage the human body can sustain due to exposure, increased cancer ris”
- Towers & siting: “many fire departments refusing to consent to cell antennae on their structures, or within a certain distance from their str”
- Research & federal duties: “less radiation is not harmless, as proven by scientific studies demonstrating the cellular damage the human body can sustain due”
ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
Wireless radiation is not harmless, as proven by scientific studies demonstrating the cellular damage the human body can sustain due to exposure, increased cancer risk after repeated exposure, and as evidenced by many fire departments refusing to consent to cell antennae on their structures, or within a certain distance from their structures. Please ensure the safety of American citizens by listening to the science and responding to it.
Discussion
Reader replies are separate from the official HHS submission. They are reviewed before publication. Display names are not verified.