AI summary & topic connections

Cites research concerning insect absorption, heating and reproduction, argues that wireless exposure threatens pollinators and agriculture, and discusses reproductive effects across species.

  • Environmental effects: “microwave and cellular/wifi frequencies decrease insect reproduction rates”
  • Proposed biological mechanisms: “due to a resonance effect.”
  • Reproduction & pregnancy: “human sperm cells”

Matched review of original text; attachments excluded. Review provenance

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
insect-pollinated agriculture is about 35% of food crops and include nuts; microwave and cellular/wifi frequencies decrease insect reproduction rates and 5G additionally occurs at a millimeter and centimeter wavelength which can cook insects of that size (and cells) due to a resonance effect. 'A shift of 10% of the incident power density to frequencies above 6 GHz would lead to an increase in absorbed power between 3–370%. This could lead to changes in insect behaviour, physiology, and morphology over time due to an increase in body temperatures, from dielectric heating.' https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22271-3 'Microwave radiation is known to kill insects and is already being used for insect control in stored grains and other foods. Studies in food and agriculture literature confirm this effect. (Yadav 2014) (Das 2013) (Geveke 2009) (Ponomaryova 2009) (Zhejiang 2004) (Geveke 2003) (Mishenko 2000)' https://mdsafetech.org/5g-telecommunications-science/ 'Sharma and Kumar [47] found a large decrease in reproduction (egg laying) of bees after exposure to mobile phone radiation, which was identically observed before in fruit flies [15,16,41,42] and birds [49–51]. The recorded decreased reproduction is strongly corroborated by very similar effects in amphibians [54,55], rats [17,46], and human sperm [44]. This unique similarity of effects in different organisms found by different research groups can be explained by the observed cell death induction in reproductive cells due to DNA damage found for Drosophila ovarian cells [15,16], human sperm cells [22], mice and rat sperm cells [10,17], and chick embryos [36]. It is evident that such a similarity of findings is not a coincidence.' https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331661949_Comparing_DNA_Damage_Induced_by_Mobile_Telephony_and_Other_Types_of_Man-Made_Electromagnetic_Fields