Hello, The world and technology has changed dramatically since the FCC adopted its human exposure guideli…

Hello, The world and technology has changed dramatically since the FCC adopted its human exposure guidelines in 1996, based on science from the 1980s. It's inconceivable and outrageous that the FCC claims to be protecting public health while it ignores the large and growing body of science showing biological harm even at non-thermal levels. For instance a recently published article in Frontiers Cardiovascular Medicine in February 2025 references a study of the potential for red blood cell aggregation from radiofrequency radiation to occur in the general population. Rouleaux formation due to mobile phone exposure is not good for you. Further studies are needed to assess the incidence of this occurrence, in addition to defining which power densities and frequencies put individuals at risk. The FCC must address studies and reflect the risks and harm of these frequencies to protect the public. Thankyou, Christy White