Topics & supporting passages
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: “The majority of non-industry-funded studies are showing reason for lots of concern in the matter of exposure.”

Topics matched to original text; attachment contents excluded. Classification details

ORIGINAL COMMENT · UNEDITED TEXT
I have followed science on EMF exposure for many years. The majority of non-industry-funded studies are showing reason for lots of concern in the matter of exposure. And increasingly, it is becoming difficult to find living locations that fall into low- or no-impact levels of EMF. And even if one finds them, there is no guarantee that locations will stay that way if there is no public input allowed. It's not out of order to state that this is already likely a significant public health problem. There should be a moratorium on any activity which increases EMF, robust unbiased study of biological effects, and more public and local oversight on proposed projects that would increase EMF.