Today we know that physiological behaviour is far more nuanced than was realized when the radiation stand…

Today we know that physiological behaviour is far more nuanced than was realized when the radiation standards were created in the 90s. There are several avenues of causation possible beyond just that resulting from DNA's heating of the human tissue. This can include damage directly from the radiation that impact the electromagnetic interactions of enzymes and/or nucleotides with their substrates without heat being involved, not to mention the possibility of radiation creating stress inflammatory cytokines without heat being the causative etiology. Ample evidence of this possibility is present in tissue culture and animal models. Moreover, the chronic exposure to the radiation over time has not even begun to be evaluated (cell phones held against the heart or brain, cell towers, etc.) The standards from the 90s are absurdly outdated when you consider the mass exposure of ever larger amounts of radiation that your constituents are being exposed to. Studies are needed but their results wouldn't be known for years. First do no harm.