[Development of innovative methods of electromagnetic field evaluation for portable radio-station].

{
    "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
    "exposure": {
        "band": null,
        "source": "portable radio-station",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": null
    },
    "population": "workers",
    "sample_size": null,
    "outcomes": [
        "EMF emission levels (measurement)",
        "Specific absorption rate (SAR) evaluation",
        "Exceedance of hygienic norms (occupational exposure limits)",
        "Potential health risk factor (inferred from exceedance)"
    ],
    "main_findings": "Measurements of EMF emissions from the portable radio-station \"Radiy-301\" and evaluation of SAR suggested that workers' EMF exposure levels may exceed hygienic norms and therefore may represent a health risk factor. The paper also considers improving EMF dosimetry for portable radio-stations via harmonization of domestic and international approaches.",
    "effect_direction": "harm",
    "limitations": [
        "No frequency, quantitative exposure levels, or SAR values reported in the abstract.",
        "Study design details and sample size are not provided.",
        "Health outcomes were not measured; health risk is inferred from potential exceedance of hygienic norms."
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.66000000000000003108624468950438313186168670654296875,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "portable radio-station",
        "Radiy-301",
        "electromagnetic fields",
        "EMF measurement",
        "specific absorption rate",
        "SAR",
        "occupational exposure",
        "hygienic norms",
        "dosimetry",
        "harmonization"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": [
        {
            "slug": "occupational-exposure",
            "weight": 0.90000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,
            "reason": "Focuses on workers' EMF exposure from a portable radio-station and comparison to hygienic norms."
        }
    ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.