I feel that this city of Murrieta may be the 5g capital of the world. I live in a retirement community 55+ and we have 5 of these bio weapons within 1/4 mile of each other and where we live, work & play!! Our city council members tell us they have no power and that the FCC tells them when & where they will be putting them up. Then they say we should be following the $$$, sounds a lot like incriminating themselves 1st, what would U feel about this? I bet U are thinking it feels great having free range and money to pay for their silence & compliance. Who is speaking up for our kids & grandkids and ourselves. Mass depopulation. No more freedom of health, we are being cooked 1 cell at a time so sad, where are the Lions & Lionesses with their Loudest ROAR. Reclaiming Our Absolute Rights. Thanks for this platform, anyone listening out there?
The radiation level is debilitating AT&t took my non-internet landline away it's debilitating it's causing severe neurological problems agitation arrhythmia insomnia hypera arousal cognitive decline it's absolutely not sustainable at all. You're killing people I have severe autoimmune and nervous dysregulation because of it. It's seriously affects me every single day they took my non-internet landline away.
Since the 5-G towers were activated here in Los Angeles city & county in May of 2019, I have experienced numerous health issues, including headachs ( I never had headaches since I was a young boy and thoses were a result of a flu infection or other common maladies! I also began to to feel fatique, irritability, short-term memory disruption, a sense of " heaviness" making basic activities more difficult! I never had those issues before the 5-G activation! I developed a neuro- muscular disorder 4 years after the activation of 5-G and experienced other immune disruptions! When I leave my home and travel to other communities that do not have such a concentration of EMF, MY SYMPTOMS DECLINE DRAMATICALLY! I have an EMF meter in my home and it shows that the radiation level is " extreme!" Sometimes, in the late evening hours, the EMF levels decline but go way up after 9:00 a.m. each day! I would move if I could, as I know a number of people who had to leave Los Angeles city because they were made ill by the EMF! From what I have read, Europe and even China have much greater restrictions on the level of EMF energy their citizens are forced to absorb! Many peer reviewed studies show a link between excessive EMF levels and human health disorders! There is Absolutly No reason why we have to endure toxic levels of EMF when other countries provide the technology to their citizens without such extreme levels of radiation!
International scientists have provided to the WHO researched proof of the multiple effects of man made EMR/EMF. This has been discounted and manipulated by those with vested interests in expanding the particular infrastructure, this to the detriment of human health. Eventually we all pay the price for ignorance.
I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: I experience negative physical affects being close to wireless radiation. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.
I am the father of two children: Joel, seven and Bresly 12 years old. My wife and I didn't know any better at the time and left our kids use their wireless devices as they wished, as a result: Joel suffers from a constellation of symptoms from difficulty to concentrate to nose-bleeding ....and when we bring him to doctors they don't know how to diagnose or treat him. Bresly, at her young age is almost blind because her excessive use of wireless screens/devices. And we are "lucky" because our neighbor has cancer. We live within 110 meters of two cell towers and the vegetation here keeps dying and birds don't come to nest as before. In my opinion wireless technologies and devices should come with big radiation warnings.
I suffer from a physiological response to wireless technologies. This happens when I am in a strong wifi environment and if I stay too long near electromagnetic frequencies from standard electrical pulsations. I didn’t want to believe that my symptoms and suffering would be so clearly caused by such ubiquitous daily technologies but the facts have remained- I feel the intensity of pulsed electromagnetic waves. My symptoms are: insomnia, headache, increased and heightened tinnitus (ringing becomes more shrill), and an overall increase in anxiety. To alleviate my reactions/illness, I have learned to prepare for a specific environment. For example, when I enter a restaurant, I use an EMF meter to find the areas of least radiation. My house is hard-wired with ethernet cables providing my internet connections and I use a landline to communicate. I do own a cell phone but it is kept in airplane mode or off most of the time. My friends and family know about my condition and they do not keep their phones on around me. I can’t attend stadium concerts, games and events where I know all phones will be pulsing their signals so, I don’t go. Luckily, I own my home and I am not subject to others’ wifi signals that would occur were I living in an apartment building. What about those who can’t afford a home and are forced to live in an unsafe environment? Sadly, I have come to believe that our government does not care about people like me. They care about the profits made by Telecom and they continue to deny that my sub-group has validity. Despite the studies that show harm, the FCC has just continued to allow more transmitters at higher frequencies to be developed. These higher frequencies (4G, 5G, 6G, 10G) are currently causing damage to plants and wildlife while the Federal government just looks the other way. I urge the FCC to take me and the thousands of us (could be millions, with symptoms blamed on the wrong cause), seriously. We are disabled and are often unable to participate in general society. Today, it is hard to find a safe place where there are no EMFs. This is why many escape into a forest, living off grid and on the edge. The small cell antennas now being deployed in every conceivable location- schools, office buildings, churches (shouldn’t they be sacred and safe places?), and on people’s homes make life impossible for those suffering from EMR-S (Electro Magnetic Syndrome). Please, take action now and prevent more suffering. Thank you, Kelly Marcotulli
10 comments displayed. More load as you scroll.
These are separate official submissions grouped by topic. A comment can appear in more than one board.