All comment threads

RF radiation exposure that i have been exposed to has caused Brain fog, hearing problems/buzzing and fatigue. This has reduced my ability to work. Pleaase update your regulations to reflect the negative effects of RF radiation. Thank you Beth Chiodo

I've personally been impacted by wireless radiation through devices at home and work. From headaches, sleeplessness, and inability to concentrate, wireless radiation has significantly impacted my life, as I've had to spend money i don't have on airtube headphones and expensive EMF blockers that I must carry everywhere to stay in my protected bubble. This has helped, but I don't know what the next generation phones and other technology may bring that I'll have to research ways to mitigate just so I can function. It's egregious that the FCC has allowed unbridled rollout of all of this wireless radiation without simple safety testing. Go to those in the EMF blocking industry. They can help, quickly. Stop harming generations of people.

When I hold my phone up to my ear my head hurts for hours. My arm bones hurt just from holding it. When I go places with no cell service, all my tension and anxiety just melts away. I believe it worsens anemia.

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: I live in a condominium complex and my building has five attached units. Five out of the five units have residents who have been diagnosed with cancer, four with bladder cancer and one with lymphoma. We have had the water tested by the State DEP and the result shows no reason for concern. There are seven cell towers within three miles of our building, two of which are within less than one-half mile. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

Wireless comment. The change of Florida Power & Light meters to smart meters along with the smart appliances, computer WiFi and multiple cell towers has negatively impacted my sleep, focus and health. Without informed consent, 16 smart meters were installed within 8 feet of my head (when I sleep in my condo). That's when the harm began. I no longer sleep in my bedroom. Over the years the technology installations have grown exponentially. I had no health issues or sleep issues before the unregulated and untested proliferation of "smart" technology. The unwillingness of regulator agencies to protect the public from harm is egregious and criminal. The real data proves harm to all life! Operate from a place of integrity or make way for someone who will.

This filing was submitted as an attachment. Open the document below to read the comment.

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: [Please add your personal story here. You may wish to describe how wireless radiation has affected you, your child or family; health effects or cancer you have experienced; concerns about long-term exposure; experiences involving cell phones, Wi-Fi, cell towers or other wireless sources; or impacts you have observed on animals, wildlife, plants or the environment.] I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

Insomnia has been a constant for me since the rollout of cell towers, wi-fi and the spread of EMFs on a vast scale. The studies made in the '90s based on heat have been shown not to be valid. Please review all studies that show effects of EMFs on the animal and even plant biology. Sincerely, Marie Roulleau

Greetings FCC, I have experienced loss of equilibrium due to electromagnetic frequency bombardment and sleep interruption from the dangerous standard frequency of 2.4 GHz. The 2.4 GHz frequency band is a globally recognized, unlicensed spectrum range (2.400–2.4835 GHz) within the Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) band, allowing devices to operate without regulatory licensing. It serves as the foundational infrastructure for ubiquitous short-range wireless technologies, most notably Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11b/g/n/ax), Bluetooth, Zigbee, and cordless phones. This is a harmful frequency implemented rather than a beneficial frequency for an unknown, but likely nefarious, purpose.