The Herzification / Bioelectric Fidelity Hypothesis
RF Safe presents the “Herzification / Bioelectric Fidelity Hypothesis,” arguing that modern RF/EMF exposure has rapidly altered the human electromagnetic environment and may degrade biological electrical signaling (“bioelectric fidelity”). The post frames this as an “evidence-anchored hypothesis” that could help explain a wide range of outcomes (e.g., cancer, infertility, ADHD-like traits, some autism phenotypes, emotional dysregulation), while acknowledging it is not definitive proof. It also cites Heinrich Hertz’s illness as a suggestive historical anecdote and references proposed non-thermal interaction mechanisms involving voltage-gated ion channels.
Key points
- Claims the shift from historically “quiet” natural EM backgrounds to dense modern RF/EMF (“herzification/radiofication”) may introduce biological “noise.”
- Proposes a unifying upstream mechanism (“bioelectric fidelity” degradation) that could manifest across multiple conditions and traits, including cancer and neurodevelopmental/behavioral outcomes.
- States explicitly that the argument is a hypothesis rather than “courtroom proof,” but urges serious attention.
- Uses Heinrich Hertz’s early high-field spark-gap RF exposure and subsequent fatal illness as a suggestive case narrative, while noting causation cannot be proven.
- References non-thermal coupling ideas involving voltage-gated ion channels (e.g., S4 voltage sensor) and an “ion forced-oscillation” model attributed to Panagopoulos et al.
Referenced studies & papers
Relevant papers in OpenMel
Source:
Open original
AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.