Clean Ether, TruthCase™ & the Light‑First Endgame
RF Safe argues that non-thermal RF and ELF exposures are a credible long-term biological stressor and that current RF safety regulation is outdated and overly focused on thermal effects. The post presents a mechanistic narrative (ion channels, mitochondria/ROS, and spin-dependent chemistry) and links this to calls for behavior change, product use (TruthCase/QuantaCase), and a transition toward Li‑Fi or “light-first” indoor connectivity. It frames regulators as having dismissed evidence and suggests a legal/regulatory failure since the 1990s, while promoting a precautionary “clean ether” approach.
Key points
- Claims regulators have dismissed non-thermal RF/ELF effects for decades and that the regulatory framework is “frozen in 1996.”
- Asserts non-thermal RF is a credible long-term biological stressor, citing (without detailed citations in the excerpt) mechanistic work and animal cancer studies.
- Proposes a mechanistic model involving voltage-gated ion channels (S4 sensors), mitochondria/NADPH oxidases producing ROS, and spin-sensitive redox chemistry.
- Links the proposed mechanisms to potential dysfunction in tissues such as heart conduction fibers, Schwann cells, immune cells, and blood rheology/endothelium.
- Promotes TruthCase/QuantaCase as a tool to reduce near-body RF exposure and encourage “safer habits.”
- Advocates shifting indoor connectivity away from microwave RF toward Li‑Fi/light-based systems as an “endgame.”
Referenced studies & papers
Relevant papers in OpenMel
Source:
Open original
AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.