Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

Survival of enterobacteria in liquid cultures during microwave radiation and conventional heating.

PAPER pubmed Microbiological research 1995 In vitro study Effect: harm Evidence: Low

Abstract

Bacteria in food have been reported to survive in larger numbers after processing by microwave radiation than after conventional processing. The bactericidal effect of a domestic microwave oven (SHARP R-7280) on certain pathogenic enterobacteria species was investigated in vitro, in comparison with conventional heating (boiling). The death rates of different nosocomial strains of Escherichia coli, Salmonella sofia, Salmonella enteritidis, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were tested. The microwave oven and the conventional heating system used were both calibrated in order to calculate temperatures from exposure times. For each strain duplicate samples of 25 ml of pure culture with concentrations at least 10(6) cfu/ml were exposed to microwave radiation. An equal number of samples of the same volume and concentration were exposed to conventional heating. Subsequently all samples were examined qualitatively and quantitatively following standard microbiological procedures. The results indicate that microwaves have an efficient bactericidal effect on the enterobacteria in liquid cultures.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
In vitro study
Effect direction
harm
Population
Sample size
Exposure
microwave domestic microwave oven
Evidence strength
Low
Confidence: 74% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

In vitro testing of several nosocomial strains (E. coli, Salmonella sofia, S. enteritidis, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) found that microwave exposure in a domestic microwave oven produced an efficient bactericidal effect in liquid cultures, compared with conventional heating (boiling).

Outcomes measured

  • Bacterial survival/death rates (qualitative and quantitative culture results)

Limitations

  • Microwave frequency and exposure parameters (e.g., power, exact duration) not reported in the abstract
  • Sample size details (number of strains/replicates beyond duplicates) not fully reported in the abstract
  • In vitro liquid culture study; may not generalize to real food matrices or clinical settings
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "in_vitro",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "microwave",
        "source": "domestic microwave oven",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": null
    },
    "population": null,
    "sample_size": null,
    "outcomes": [
        "Bacterial survival/death rates (qualitative and quantitative culture results)"
    ],
    "main_findings": "In vitro testing of several nosocomial strains (E. coli, Salmonella sofia, S. enteritidis, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) found that microwave exposure in a domestic microwave oven produced an efficient bactericidal effect in liquid cultures, compared with conventional heating (boiling).",
    "effect_direction": "harm",
    "limitations": [
        "Microwave frequency and exposure parameters (e.g., power, exact duration) not reported in the abstract",
        "Sample size details (number of strains/replicates beyond duplicates) not fully reported in the abstract",
        "In vitro liquid culture study; may not generalize to real food matrices or clinical settings"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "microwave radiation",
        "domestic microwave oven",
        "conventional heating",
        "boiling",
        "bactericidal effect",
        "enterobacteria",
        "Escherichia coli",
        "Salmonella sofia",
        "Salmonella enteritidis",
        "Proteus mirabilis",
        "Pseudomonas aeruginosa",
        "in vitro"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.