Impact of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on CD4 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Abstract
There is increasing evidence suggesting that extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) may influence several cell functions. Here the effects of ELF-EMF were studied on the expression of CD4+ cell surface receptors of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACScan). The expression of CD4+ in ELF-EMF exposed (24, 48 and 72 h) and not exposed PBMC were not statistically significant. In addition, a flow cytometric analysis was determined by using a fluorescent labeled antibody, at 24 and 72 h incubations. The amount of bound antibody was distributed with a slight difference in the ELF-EMF-exposed PBMC compared to the not exposed cells. Moreover, DNA CD4+ expression in PBMC strongly increased in exposed cells, resting and activated with Phytohaemaglutinin (PHA). When polymerase chain reaction was performed on CD4+ mRNA of PBMC an increase of CD4+ mRNA expression was found after the resting cells were exposed to ELF-EMF at 24 h compared to not exposed cells, while at 48 and 72 h no difference was found. In the cell cycle progression analysis, the PBMC exposed to ELF-EMF presented a significant increase of percentage expression of cell cycle progression in the S phase compared to not exposed cells; while in G1 and G2 phases, there were no differences. Our results provide new evidence that ELF-EMF can affect CD4+ expression in PBMC and describe an additional biological activity for ELF-EMF affecting CD4+ transcription and translation protein and the increase of the percentage expression of the cell cycle progression of the S phase.
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
CD4+ cell surface receptor expression measured by FACScan was not statistically significantly different between ELF-EMF exposed and unexposed PBMC at 24, 48, and 72 h, though a slight difference in bound antibody distribution was noted at 24 and 72 h. CD4+ DNA expression was reported to strongly increase in exposed cells (resting and PHA-activated), and CD4+ mRNA increased at 24 h in resting cells but not at 48 or 72 h. Exposed PBMC showed a significant increase in the percentage of cells in S phase, with no differences in G1 or G2.
Outcomes measured
- CD4+ cell surface receptor expression (flow cytometry/FACScan)
- Bound anti-CD4 antibody distribution (flow cytometry)
- CD4+ DNA expression
- CD4+ mRNA expression (PCR)
- Cell cycle progression (S, G1, G2 phases)
Limitations
- Exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, field strength) not reported in the abstract
- Sample size not reported in the abstract
- In vitro study; generalizability to in vivo human health outcomes is unclear
- Some results described qualitatively (e.g., 'slight difference') without quantitative detail in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "in_vitro",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "24, 48 and 72 h"
},
"population": "Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"CD4+ cell surface receptor expression (flow cytometry/FACScan)",
"Bound anti-CD4 antibody distribution (flow cytometry)",
"CD4+ DNA expression",
"CD4+ mRNA expression (PCR)",
"Cell cycle progression (S, G1, G2 phases)"
],
"main_findings": "CD4+ cell surface receptor expression measured by FACScan was not statistically significantly different between ELF-EMF exposed and unexposed PBMC at 24, 48, and 72 h, though a slight difference in bound antibody distribution was noted at 24 and 72 h. CD4+ DNA expression was reported to strongly increase in exposed cells (resting and PHA-activated), and CD4+ mRNA increased at 24 h in resting cells but not at 48 or 72 h. Exposed PBMC showed a significant increase in the percentage of cells in S phase, with no differences in G1 or G2.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, field strength) not reported in the abstract",
"Sample size not reported in the abstract",
"In vitro study; generalizability to in vivo human health outcomes is unclear",
"Some results described qualitatively (e.g., 'slight difference') without quantitative detail in the abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"extremely low frequency",
"ELF-EMF",
"CD4",
"peripheral blood mononuclear cells",
"PBMC",
"flow cytometry",
"FACScan",
"PCR",
"mRNA expression",
"cell cycle",
"S phase",
"phytohaemaglutinin",
"PHA"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.