Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

RF-EMF exposure at 1800 MHz did not elicit DNA damage or abnormal cellular behaviors in different neurogenic cells.

PAPER pubmed Bioelectromagnetics 2017 In vitro study Effect: no_effect Evidence: Low

Abstract

Despite many years of studies, the debate on genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) continues. To systematically evaluate genotoxicity of RF-EMF, this study examined effects of RF-EMF on DNA damage and cellular behavior in different neurogenic cells. Neurogenic A172, U251, and SH-SY5Y cells were intermittently (5 min on/10 min off) exposed to 1800 MHz RF-EMF at an average specific absorption rate (SAR) of 4.0 W/kg for 1, 6, or 24 h. DNA damage was evaluated by quantification of γH2AX foci, an early marker of DNA double-strand breaks. Cell cycle progression, cell proliferation, and cell viability were examined by flow cytometry, hemocytometer, and cell counting kit-8 assay, respectively. Results showed that exposure to RF-EMF at an SAR of 4.0 W/kg neither significantly induced γH2AX foci formation in A172, U251, or SH-SY5Y cells, nor resulted in abnormal cell cycle progression, cell proliferation, or cell viability. Furthermore, prolonged incubation of these cells for up to 48 h after exposure did not significantly affect cellular behavior. Our data suggest that 1800 MHz RF-EMF exposure at 4.0 W/kg is unlikely to elicit DNA damage or abnormal cellular behaviors in neurogenic cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 38:175-185, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
In vitro study
Effect direction
no_effect
Population
Neurogenic cell lines (A172, U251, SH-SY5Y)
Sample size
Exposure
RF · 1800 MHz · 4 W/kg · Intermittent (5 min on/10 min off) for 1, 6, or 24 h; follow-up incubation up to 48 h post-exposure
Evidence strength
Low
Confidence: 86% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

Intermittent exposure to 1800 MHz RF-EMF at average SAR 4.0 W/kg for 1, 6, or 24 h did not significantly induce γH2AX foci in A172, U251, or SH-SY5Y cells and did not cause abnormal cell cycle progression, proliferation, or viability. Incubation up to 48 h after exposure also did not significantly affect cellular behavior.

Outcomes measured

  • DNA damage (γH2AX foci; marker of DNA double-strand breaks)
  • Cell cycle progression
  • Cell proliferation
  • Cell viability
  • Cellular behavior up to 48 h post-exposure
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "in_vitro",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "RF",
        "source": null,
        "frequency_mhz": 1800,
        "sar_wkg": 4,
        "duration": "Intermittent (5 min on/10 min off) for 1, 6, or 24 h; follow-up incubation up to 48 h post-exposure"
    },
    "population": "Neurogenic cell lines (A172, U251, SH-SY5Y)",
    "sample_size": null,
    "outcomes": [
        "DNA damage (γH2AX foci; marker of DNA double-strand breaks)",
        "Cell cycle progression",
        "Cell proliferation",
        "Cell viability",
        "Cellular behavior up to 48 h post-exposure"
    ],
    "main_findings": "Intermittent exposure to 1800 MHz RF-EMF at average SAR 4.0 W/kg for 1, 6, or 24 h did not significantly induce γH2AX foci in A172, U251, or SH-SY5Y cells and did not cause abnormal cell cycle progression, proliferation, or viability. Incubation up to 48 h after exposure also did not significantly affect cellular behavior.",
    "effect_direction": "no_effect",
    "limitations": [],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.85999999999999998667732370449812151491641998291015625,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "RF-EMF",
        "1800 MHz",
        "SAR 4.0 W/kg",
        "genotoxicity",
        "DNA damage",
        "γH2AX",
        "double-strand breaks",
        "cell cycle",
        "cell proliferation",
        "cell viability",
        "neurogenic cells",
        "A172",
        "U251",
        "SH-SY5Y"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.