Increased incidence of cancer in a cohort of office workers exposed to strong magnetic fields.
Abstract
A small cohort of 410 office workers (263 men and 147 women, ever employed) exposed to strong magnetic fields by three 12 kV transformers located beneath their first-floor office developed eight incident cancers over a 15 year exposure period. Only one cancer was ascertained in the 254 workers employed for less than 2 years, compared to seven cancer cases ascertained in the 156 workers employed for 2 years or more (p = 0.0057; Fisher's exact test). An analysis of linear trend of cancer incidence using average years employed as an exposure score was positive (p = 0.00337) with an odds ratio of 15.1 in workers employed over 5 years. A positive trend of cancer cases with duration of employment is seen for males and females separately and together (p < 0.05). For workers employed more than 2 years, the standardized cancer incidence ratio was 389 (95% confidence interval 156-801). Cumulative magnetic field exposure may be of etiologic importance in explaining the cancer incidence pattern in this cohort.
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
In a cohort of 410 office workers exposed to strong magnetic fields from three 12 kV transformers, eight incident cancers occurred over a 15-year exposure period. Cancer incidence was higher among workers employed ≥2 years (7/156) than among those employed <2 years (1/254) (p=0.0057), with a positive linear trend by years employed (p=0.00337) and an odds ratio of 15.1 for workers employed >5 years. For workers employed >2 years, the standardized cancer incidence ratio was 389 (95% CI 156–801).
Outcomes measured
- Incident cancer
- Cancer incidence (standardized incidence ratio)
Limitations
- Small cohort size and small number of cancer cases (8 total)
- Exposure characterized by employment duration as an exposure score; no quantitative magnetic field measurements reported in abstract
- Potential confounding factors and cancer ascertainment methods not described in abstract
Suggested hubs
-
occupational-exposure
(0.9) Cohort of office workers exposed to strong magnetic fields from workplace transformers.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "cohort",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": "occupational",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "15 year exposure period; employment duration categories (<2 years, ≥2 years, >5 years)"
},
"population": "Office workers exposed to strong magnetic fields from three 12 kV transformers located beneath their first-floor office",
"sample_size": 410,
"outcomes": [
"Incident cancer",
"Cancer incidence (standardized incidence ratio)"
],
"main_findings": "In a cohort of 410 office workers exposed to strong magnetic fields from three 12 kV transformers, eight incident cancers occurred over a 15-year exposure period. Cancer incidence was higher among workers employed ≥2 years (7/156) than among those employed <2 years (1/254) (p=0.0057), with a positive linear trend by years employed (p=0.00337) and an odds ratio of 15.1 for workers employed >5 years. For workers employed >2 years, the standardized cancer incidence ratio was 389 (95% CI 156–801).",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"Small cohort size and small number of cancer cases (8 total)",
"Exposure characterized by employment duration as an exposure score; no quantitative magnetic field measurements reported in abstract",
"Potential confounding factors and cancer ascertainment methods not described in abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.7800000000000000266453525910037569701671600341796875,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"office workers",
"occupational exposure",
"magnetic fields",
"transformers",
"cancer incidence",
"employment duration",
"standardized incidence ratio"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0.90000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,
"reason": "Cohort of office workers exposed to strong magnetic fields from workplace transformers."
}
]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.