TruthCase™ by RF SAFE QuantaCase
RF Safe promotes its TruthCase™ (QuantaCase®) phone case as a "training tool" and "physics-first" product intended to reduce RF exposure through correct phone orientation and design, while criticizing many "anti-radiation" cases as potentially increasing exposure by detuning antennas. The post also argues that current RF safety policy relies on "1990s, heat-only limits" and calls for stronger protections, especially for children. It presents a proposed biological mechanism framework ("S4–Mito–Spin") describing how weak RF/ELF fields might interact with voltage-gated channels, mitochondria/ROS pathways, and spin-sensitive redox chemistry, but does not provide study details in the excerpt.
Key points
- Markets TruthCase™ as more than shielding, emphasizing user behavior (phone orientation/habits) and product design to reduce dose.
- Claims many competing "anti-radiation" cases can worsen exposure by detuning antennas or prompting higher transmit power, especially near the ear-side opening.
- Frames EMF risk as involving non-thermal RF/ELF biological interactions and highlights organs/tissues it says appear as "hotspots" (e.g., heart, brain, testis, immune system, blood).
- Argues RF exposure policy is outdated and constrained (mentions Section 704 and Public Law 90-602/EPRC) and calls for policy reform to protect families/children.
- Introduces the "S4–Mito–Spin" mechanism narrative (voltage sensors, ROS engines, spin-sensitive redox cofactors) as an explanatory model for mixed EMF findings.
Referenced studies & papers
Relevant papers in OpenMel
Source:
Open original
AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.