The 140-Year Low-Fidelity Experiment

Read original source →

This RF Safe position piece argues that long-term exposure to “non-native,” low-fidelity electromagnetic environments (including man-made RF) can degrade biological timing and coherence, contributing to downstream issues such as immune dysregulation and oxidative stress. It frames this as a systems-level claim rather than asserting RF “causes” specific diseases, and it cites proposed biophysical mechanisms (e.g., coupling into dense tissues, membrane voltage-sensing domains, mitochondrial/redox pathways). The article also references Heinrich Hertz’s historical exposure to early radio experiments and a retrospective medical analysis of his illness, while stating it is not claiming RF caused his condition.

Key points

  • The author argues sustained “low-fidelity” EM environments precede later clusters of timing-, signaling-, immune-, and oxidative-stress–related disorders, presented as a systems statement rather than disease-specific causation.
  • Claims that biological function depends on timing/phase/coherence and that degraded timing leads to degraded physiological “fidelity.”
  • Asserts man-made RF differs from Earth’s native EM environment and can couple into electrically dense biological structures, with sensitivity varying by tissue density.
  • Proposes mechanisms involving excitable membranes (voltage-sensing domains), mitochondrial amplification of timing disturbances into redox/metabolic stress, and spin-dependent redox chemistry as plausible coupling pathways.
  • Uses Heinrich Hertz’s proximity to spark-gap transmitters and a retrospective analysis suggesting granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) as a historical example, while disclaiming direct causation by RF.
  • Frames the issue partly as a policy failure and implies “the Light Age” as a coherent exit strategy (details not fully provided in the excerpt).

Referenced studies & papers

Source: Open original

AI-generated summaries may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.