Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

Bluetooth versus non-Bluetooth earphones and their potential harmful effect on hearing: a cross-sectional study conducted among undergraduate medical students, Saudi Arabia

PAPER manual 2022 Cross-sectional study Effect: mixed Evidence: Low

Abstract

Bluetooth versus non-Bluetooth earphones and their potential harmful effect on hearing: a cross-sectional study conducted among undergraduate medical students, Saudi Arabia Zeinab A. Abd-El.haleem, Madania M N. Idrees, Waqas Sami, Shamshad B.A. Loni, Hemmat H.G.Hareedy. Bluetooth versus non- Bluetooth earphones and their potential harmful effect on hearing: a cross-sectional study conducted among undergraduate medical students, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECSE). 2022. 14(03): 3115. Abstract Background The use of Bluetooth and non- Bluetooth earphones is increasing worldwide. Improper use of these devices is associated with a higher risk for hearing loss. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of use of Bluetooth and non -Bluetooth earphones on hearing function and to determine whether the combined use of both types have more negative impact on hearing or not. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on 42 adult female students in medical college, Majmaah University. It included a questionnaire to evaluate earphone listening habits and pure-tone audiometry to assess hearing function. The data was analyzed using ANOVA and Chi-square tests to fulfill the objectives of the study. Results Around 85.7% of the students had hearing threshold ≥20 dB HL at one or more frequencies. Left ears were more affected than right ears. Hearing threshold > 40dB HL was observed in left ear. A significant higher difference was only observed between combined group and Bluetooth group at frequency of 250 Hz in left ear. No significant difference was observed between studied groups at other frequencies. Poorer hearing thresholds was observed in those who frequently used earphones. Conclusion Main hearing thresholds were poor in earphone users which could be interpreted as earphones use may have negative impact on hearing. The combined use of both types of earphones did not show more negative impact on hearing threshold. It is essential to implement education programs in order to raise young people's awareness of proper earphone use and change their attitudes toward them. Conclusion Pure-tone audiometry showed poor hearing thresholds in those using earphones for more than 1 year. 85.7% of the students had hearing thresholds >20 dB HL at one or more frequencies. Mild hearing loss was observed in both right and left ears. Moderate hearing loss was observed in left ear only. On comparing the mean hearing thresholds of the three studied group, a higher hearing threshold was only observed between the combined and Bluetooth groups at frequency of 250 Hz in left ear. In right ear no difference was observed between the three studied groups at all frequencies. Thus, combined use of Bluetooth and non-Bluetooth earphones did not show more risk on hearing function in relation to either Bluetooth or non-Bluetooth alone. Open access paper: int-jecse.net

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Cross-sectional study
Effect direction
mixed
Population
Adult female undergraduate medical students at Majmaah University (Saudi Arabia)
Sample size
42
Exposure
RF Bluetooth earphones and non-Bluetooth (wired) earphones · More than 1 year of earphone use (reported)
Evidence strength
Low
Confidence: 78% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

In this cross-sectional sample, 85.7% of students had hearing threshold ≥20 dB HL at one or more frequencies, with left ears reported as more affected than right ears and hearing threshold >40 dB HL observed in the left ear. A statistically significant difference was reported only between the combined-use group and the Bluetooth group at 250 Hz in the left ear; no significant differences were observed between groups at other frequencies. Poorer hearing thresholds were reported among those who frequently used earphones, and the authors conclude that combined use of Bluetooth and non-Bluetooth earphones did not show more negative impact than either type alone.

Outcomes measured

  • Pure-tone audiometry hearing thresholds (dB HL) by frequency
  • Prevalence of hearing threshold ≥20 dB HL at one or more frequencies
  • Comparison of hearing thresholds between Bluetooth, non-Bluetooth, and combined-use groups

Limitations

  • Cross-sectional design (cannot establish causality)
  • Small sample size (42 participants)
  • All participants were adult female students from a single university (limited generalizability)
  • Exposure details (e.g., volume level, exact duration, and device output) not quantified in the abstract
  • Potential self-report bias in listening habits questionnaire
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "publication_year": 2022,
    "study_type": "cross_sectional",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "RF",
        "source": "Bluetooth earphones and non-Bluetooth (wired) earphones",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": "More than 1 year of earphone use (reported)"
    },
    "population": "Adult female undergraduate medical students at Majmaah University (Saudi Arabia)",
    "sample_size": 42,
    "outcomes": [
        "Pure-tone audiometry hearing thresholds (dB HL) by frequency",
        "Prevalence of hearing threshold ≥20 dB HL at one or more frequencies",
        "Comparison of hearing thresholds between Bluetooth, non-Bluetooth, and combined-use groups"
    ],
    "main_findings": "In this cross-sectional sample, 85.7% of students had hearing threshold ≥20 dB HL at one or more frequencies, with left ears reported as more affected than right ears and hearing threshold >40 dB HL observed in the left ear. A statistically significant difference was reported only between the combined-use group and the Bluetooth group at 250 Hz in the left ear; no significant differences were observed between groups at other frequencies. Poorer hearing thresholds were reported among those who frequently used earphones, and the authors conclude that combined use of Bluetooth and non-Bluetooth earphones did not show more negative impact than either type alone.",
    "effect_direction": "mixed",
    "limitations": [
        "Cross-sectional design (cannot establish causality)",
        "Small sample size (42 participants)",
        "All participants were adult female students from a single university (limited generalizability)",
        "Exposure details (e.g., volume level, exact duration, and device output) not quantified in the abstract",
        "Potential self-report bias in listening habits questionnaire"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.7800000000000000266453525910037569701671600341796875,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "stance": "concern",
    "stance_confidence": 0.66000000000000003108624468950438313186168670654296875,
    "summary": "This cross-sectional study of 42 adult female medical students compared hearing thresholds among users of Bluetooth earphones, non-Bluetooth earphones, and combined use. Most participants (85.7%) had hearing thresholds ≥20 dB HL at one or more frequencies, with the left ear reported as more affected. Group differences were largely not significant, except at 250 Hz in the left ear between combined-use and Bluetooth groups, and the authors report that combined use did not show more negative impact than either type alone.",
    "key_points": [
        "The study assessed hearing using pure-tone audiometry and listening habits via questionnaire.",
        "Among participants, 85.7% had hearing threshold ≥20 dB HL at one or more frequencies.",
        "Left ears were reported as more affected than right ears, with >40 dB HL observed in the left ear.",
        "A significant difference was reported only at 250 Hz in the left ear between combined-use and Bluetooth groups.",
        "No significant differences between groups were reported at other tested frequencies.",
        "Poorer hearing thresholds were observed in frequent earphone users.",
        "The authors conclude that combined Bluetooth and non-Bluetooth use did not add additional risk compared with either alone."
    ],
    "categories": [
        "Hearing & Auditory Effects",
        "Consumer Devices",
        "Radiofrequency (RF)"
    ],
    "tags": [
        "Bluetooth Earphones",
        "Wired Earphones",
        "Pure-Tone Audiometry",
        "Hearing Threshold",
        "Hearing Loss",
        "Undergraduate Students",
        "Cross-Sectional Study",
        "Listening Habits"
    ],
    "keywords": [
        "Bluetooth",
        "non-Bluetooth earphones",
        "hearing threshold",
        "pure-tone audiometry",
        "students",
        "Saudi Arabia"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": [],
    "social": {
        "tweet": "Cross-sectional study (n=42) of female medical students compared hearing thresholds in Bluetooth vs wired vs combined earphone users. 85.7% had ≥20 dB HL at ≥1 frequency; group differences were mostly non-significant except at 250 Hz (left ear).",
        "facebook": "A cross-sectional study among 42 female medical students assessed hearing with pure-tone audiometry and compared Bluetooth, wired, and combined earphone use. Most participants had ≥20 dB HL at one or more frequencies, with few significant differences between groups; combined use was not reported to be worse than either type alone.",
        "linkedin": "In a cross-sectional study of 42 adult female medical students, pure-tone audiometry was used to compare hearing thresholds among Bluetooth, wired, and combined earphone users. Most participants showed thresholds ≥20 dB HL at one or more frequencies, while between-group differences were largely not significant except at 250 Hz in the left ear."
    }
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.