Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

Measurement of ventilatory frequency in unrestrained rodents using microwave radiation.

PAPER pubmed Respiration physiology 1984 Engineering / measurement Effect: unclear Evidence: Insufficient

Abstract

A novel technique for remote determination of breathing frequency in unrestrained rodents using microwave radiation is described. Single mice were placed inside a rectangular waveguide operating at 2450 MHz. Because mice efficiently absorb radio frequency energy at 2450 MHz, any change in their absorption, as occurs rhythmically with breathing, can be detected by monitoring the changes in power transmitted through the waveguide. When the volume of the mouse increases during inspiration, transmitted power through the waveguide momentarily decreases - during expiration the reverse takes place. By differential amplification of the analog output of the power meter used to monitor transmitted power, breathing frequency can be easily recorded on conventional recording equipment. The microwave technique has a definite advantage over other methods in that breathing frequency can be remotely monitored without the need to attach wire leads or surgically implant telemetry probes. This greatly reduces unnecessary stress to the animal. By use of larger waveguides the principle of this technique may be applied to larger species.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Engineering / measurement
Effect direction
unclear
Population
unrestrained mice (single mice)
Sample size
Exposure
microwave waveguide (microwave radiation) · 2450 MHz
Evidence strength
Insufficient
Confidence: 74% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

A remote method to determine breathing frequency in unrestrained mice was described using a rectangular waveguide at 2450 MHz. Rhythmic changes in microwave power transmitted through the waveguide tracked inspiration/expiration due to changes in the mouse’s absorption, enabling breathing frequency recording without attached leads or implanted probes.

Outcomes measured

  • ventilatory (breathing) frequency measurement/monitoring
  • changes in transmitted microwave power correlated with respiration

Limitations

  • Sample size not reported in abstract
  • No quantitative performance metrics (e.g., accuracy/validation vs. reference method) reported in abstract
  • Exposure level (e.g., SAR/power density) and duration not reported in abstract
  • Not designed to assess health effects; primarily a measurement technique
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "engineering",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "microwave",
        "source": "waveguide (microwave radiation)",
        "frequency_mhz": 2450,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": null
    },
    "population": "unrestrained mice (single mice)",
    "sample_size": null,
    "outcomes": [
        "ventilatory (breathing) frequency measurement/monitoring",
        "changes in transmitted microwave power correlated with respiration"
    ],
    "main_findings": "A remote method to determine breathing frequency in unrestrained mice was described using a rectangular waveguide at 2450 MHz. Rhythmic changes in microwave power transmitted through the waveguide tracked inspiration/expiration due to changes in the mouse’s absorption, enabling breathing frequency recording without attached leads or implanted probes.",
    "effect_direction": "unclear",
    "limitations": [
        "Sample size not reported in abstract",
        "No quantitative performance metrics (e.g., accuracy/validation vs. reference method) reported in abstract",
        "Exposure level (e.g., SAR/power density) and duration not reported in abstract",
        "Not designed to assess health effects; primarily a measurement technique"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
    "confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "microwave radiation",
        "2450 MHz",
        "waveguide",
        "respiration monitoring",
        "ventilatory frequency",
        "mice",
        "remote measurement"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.