Comment on Redmayne, M.; Maisch, D.R. ICNIRP Guidelines' Exposure Assessment Method for 5G Millimetre Wave Radiation May Trigger Adverse Effects. 2023, , 5267.
Abstract
This article discusses the contention in the commented-upon paper that Brillouin precursors generated by 5G New Radio (5G NR) and other cellular systems are a possible cause of tissue damage at deeper layers of tissue than the power penetration depth of the carrier frequency. The original theory for Brillouin precursors from pulsed radiofrequency signals (RF-EMF) and speculation about their possible health effects dates back to the 1990's and was based on studies of the propagation of very short (nanosecond) ultrawide-bandwidth RF pulses through water. This assumption is not correct for cellular telephone signals due to their narrow bandwidth. The commented-on paper provides no alternative rationale as to why Brillouin effects should cause tissue damage from RF-EMF radiation from cellular and other communications systems. Other inaccuracies in this paper concerning thermal responses of tissue to RF-EMF are also noted.
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
This comment argues that the Brillouin-precursor mechanism proposed in the commented paper is not applicable to cellular telephone signals because those signals are narrow bandwidth, unlike the very short ultrawide-bandwidth pulses used in earlier Brillouin-precursor studies. It states the commented paper provides no alternative rationale for Brillouin effects causing tissue damage from cellular/communications RF-EMF and notes additional inaccuracies regarding thermal tissue responses.
Outcomes measured
- tissue damage (discussed/contested)
- thermal responses of tissue to RF-EMF (discussed)
Limitations
- Commentary/critique rather than original experimental or epidemiologic study
- Does not present new exposure measurements or health outcome data in the abstract
Suggested hubs
-
5g-policy
(0.78) Focuses on 5G millimetre-wave exposure assessment and critiques claims about adverse effects.
-
who-icnirp
(0.72) Directly concerns ICNIRP guidelines and their exposure assessment method.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "other",
"exposure": {
"band": "mmWave",
"source": "5G NR / cellular systems",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": null,
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"tissue damage (discussed/contested)",
"thermal responses of tissue to RF-EMF (discussed)"
],
"main_findings": "This comment argues that the Brillouin-precursor mechanism proposed in the commented paper is not applicable to cellular telephone signals because those signals are narrow bandwidth, unlike the very short ultrawide-bandwidth pulses used in earlier Brillouin-precursor studies. It states the commented paper provides no alternative rationale for Brillouin effects causing tissue damage from cellular/communications RF-EMF and notes additional inaccuracies regarding thermal tissue responses.",
"effect_direction": "no_effect",
"limitations": [
"Commentary/critique rather than original experimental or epidemiologic study",
"Does not present new exposure measurements or health outcome data in the abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "insufficient",
"confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"5G",
"5G NR",
"millimetre wave",
"RF-EMF",
"Brillouin precursors",
"bandwidth",
"tissue damage",
"thermal effects",
"ICNIRP guidelines"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "5g-policy",
"weight": 0.7800000000000000266453525910037569701671600341796875,
"reason": "Focuses on 5G millimetre-wave exposure assessment and critiques claims about adverse effects."
},
{
"slug": "who-icnirp",
"weight": 0.7199999999999999733546474089962430298328399658203125,
"reason": "Directly concerns ICNIRP guidelines and their exposure assessment method."
}
]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.