Rapid-onset/offset, variably scheduled 60 Hz electric and magnetic field exposure reduces nocturnal serum melatonin concentration in nonhuman primates.
Abstract
Experiments with rodents indicate that power-frequency electric field (EF) or magnetic field (MF) exposure can suppress the normal nocturnal increase in melatonin concentration in pineal gland and blood. In a separate set of three experiments conducted with nonhuman primates, we did not observe melatonin suppression as a result of 6 weeks of day-time exposure to combined 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields (E/MF) with regularly scheduled "slow" E/MF onsets/offsets. The study described here used a different exposure paradigm in which two baboons were exposed to E/MF with "rapid" E/MF onsets/offsets accompanied by EF transients not found with slowly ramped E/MF onset/offset; profound reductions in nocturnal serum melatonin concentration were observed in this experiment. If replicated in a more extensive experiment, the observation of melatonin suppression only in the presence of E/MF transients would suggest that very specific exposure parameters determine the effects of 60 Hz E/MF on melatonin.
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
In two baboons exposed to combined 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields with rapid onsets/offsets (with associated electric-field transients), profound reductions in nocturnal serum melatonin concentration were observed. The abstract contrasts this with prior primate experiments in which 6 weeks of daytime exposure with regularly scheduled slow onsets/offsets did not show melatonin suppression.
Outcomes measured
- Nocturnal serum melatonin concentration
Limitations
- Very small sample size (two baboons)
- Findings described as needing replication in a more extensive experiment
- Exposure duration and detailed exposure metrics (field strengths) not provided in the abstract
Suggested hubs
-
occupational-exposure
(0.2) Study concerns power-frequency (60 Hz) electric and magnetic field exposure, which is commonly discussed in occupational/utility contexts, though the abstract does not specify an occupational setting.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": 0.059999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Two baboons (nonhuman primates)",
"sample_size": 2,
"outcomes": [
"Nocturnal serum melatonin concentration"
],
"main_findings": "In two baboons exposed to combined 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields with rapid onsets/offsets (with associated electric-field transients), profound reductions in nocturnal serum melatonin concentration were observed. The abstract contrasts this with prior primate experiments in which 6 weeks of daytime exposure with regularly scheduled slow onsets/offsets did not show melatonin suppression.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Very small sample size (two baboons)",
"Findings described as needing replication in a more extensive experiment",
"Exposure duration and detailed exposure metrics (field strengths) not provided in the abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "very_low",
"confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"60 Hz",
"ELF",
"electric field",
"magnetic field",
"transients",
"rapid onset/offset",
"melatonin",
"nocturnal",
"serum",
"baboons",
"nonhuman primates"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0.200000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,
"reason": "Study concerns power-frequency (60 Hz) electric and magnetic field exposure, which is commonly discussed in occupational/utility contexts, though the abstract does not specify an occupational setting."
}
]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.