Chronic electromagnetic field exposure decreases HSP70 levels and lowers cytoprotection.
Abstract
Electromagnetic field (EMF) exposures have been shown to induce heat shock proteins (HSPs), which help to maintain the conformation of cellular proteins during periods of stress. We have previously reported that short-term exposure of chick embryos to either 60 Hz (extremely low frequency: ELF), or radio-frequency (RF: 915 MHz) EMFs induce protection against hypoxia. Experiments presented in the current report are based on a study in which long-term (4 days), continuous exposure to ELF-EMFs decreased protection against ultraviolet radiation. Based on this result, it was hypothesized that de-protection against hypoxia should also occur following long-term, continuous, or daily, repeated exposures to EMFs. To test this hypothesis, chick embryos were exposed to ELF-EMFs (8 microT) continuously for 4 days, or to ELF or RF (3.5 mW incident power)-EMFs repeated daily (20, 30, or 60 min once or twice daily for 4 days). Several of the exposure protocols yielded embryos that had statistically significant decreases in protection against hypoxic stress (continuous and 30 or 60 min ELF twice daily; or 30 or 60 min once daily RF). This is consistent with our finding that following 4 days of ELF-EMF exposure, HSP70 levels decline by 27% as compared to controls. In addition, the superposition of ELF-EMF noise, previously shown to minimize ELF-EMF induced hypoxia protection, inhibited hypoxia de-protection caused by long term, continuous ELF or daily, repeated RF exposures. This EMF-induced decrease in HSP70 levels and resulting decline in cytoprotection suggests a mechanism by which daily exposure (such as might be experienced by mobile phone users) could enhance the probability of cancer and other diseases.
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
Several long-term exposure protocols produced statistically significant decreases in protection against hypoxic stress (continuous ELF; 30 or 60 min ELF twice daily; 30 or 60 min RF once daily). After 4 days of ELF exposure, HSP70 levels declined by 27% compared with controls. Superposition of ELF-EMF noise inhibited hypoxia de-protection caused by long-term continuous ELF or daily repeated RF exposures.
Outcomes measured
- HSP70 levels
- Cytoprotection/protection against hypoxic stress
- Protection against ultraviolet radiation
- Effect of superposed ELF-EMF noise on hypoxia de-protection
Limitations
- Sample size not reported in abstract
- Exposure metric for RF given as incident power (3.5 mW) without SAR or field strength details
- Findings are from chick embryos; generalizability to humans not established in abstract
- Mechanistic/disease implications (e.g., cancer probability) are speculative in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": "mixed",
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": 915,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "Continuous 4 days (ELF 60 Hz, 8 microT) or repeated daily exposures for 4 days (20/30/60 min once or twice daily; ELF or RF with 3.5 mW incident power)"
},
"population": "Chick embryos",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"HSP70 levels",
"Cytoprotection/protection against hypoxic stress",
"Protection against ultraviolet radiation",
"Effect of superposed ELF-EMF noise on hypoxia de-protection"
],
"main_findings": "Several long-term exposure protocols produced statistically significant decreases in protection against hypoxic stress (continuous ELF; 30 or 60 min ELF twice daily; 30 or 60 min RF once daily). After 4 days of ELF exposure, HSP70 levels declined by 27% compared with controls. Superposition of ELF-EMF noise inhibited hypoxia de-protection caused by long-term continuous ELF or daily repeated RF exposures.",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not reported in abstract",
"Exposure metric for RF given as incident power (3.5 mW) without SAR or field strength details",
"Findings are from chick embryos; generalizability to humans not established in abstract",
"Mechanistic/disease implications (e.g., cancer probability) are speculative in the abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"electromagnetic field",
"ELF",
"60 Hz",
"RF",
"915 MHz",
"chick embryo",
"HSP70",
"heat shock proteins",
"hypoxia",
"cytoprotection",
"ultraviolet radiation",
"noise superposition"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.