Share

Effect of magnetic fields on tumor growth and viability.

PAPER pubmed Comparative medicine 2011 Animal study Effect: benefit Evidence: Low

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common nonskin cancer and is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. Most methods of intervention involve combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, and ionizing radiation. Both chemotherapy and ionizing radiation can be effective against many types of cancer, but they also harm normal tissues. The use of nonionizing, magnetic fields has shown early promise in a number of in vitro and animal studies. Our study tested the effect of varying durations of magnetic exposure on tumor growth and viability in mice injected with breast cancer cells. Cancer cells were labeled through stable expression of firefly luciferase for monitoring of tumor growth and progression by using an in vivo imaging system. We hypothesized that magnetic field exposure would influence tumor growth and progression. Our results showed that exposure of the mice to magnetic fields for 360 min daily for as long as 4 wk suppressed tumor growth. Our study is unique in that it uses an in vivo imaging system to monitor the growth and progression of tumors in real time in individual mice. Our findings support further exploration of the potential of magnetic fields in cancer therapeutics, either as adjunct or primary therapy.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Animal study
Effect direction
benefit
Population
Mice injected with breast cancer cells (luciferase-labeled)
Sample size
β€”
Exposure
magnetic field exposure Β· 360 min daily for as long as 4 wk (varied durations mentioned)
Evidence strength
Low
Confidence: 74% Β· Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

In mice injected with breast cancer cells, exposure to magnetic fields for 360 minutes daily for up to 4 weeks suppressed tumor growth, as monitored by an in vivo imaging system.

Outcomes measured

  • Tumor growth
  • Tumor viability
  • Tumor progression (in vivo imaging)

Limitations

  • Magnetic field parameters (e.g., intensity, frequency) not reported in abstract
  • Sample size not reported in abstract
  • Details on comparison/control conditions not reported in abstract
  • Tumor viability results not described in detail in abstract

Suggested hubs

  • animal-studies (0.9)
    Mouse tumor model evaluating magnetic field exposure effects on tumor growth.
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "animal",
    "exposure": {
        "band": null,
        "source": "magnetic field exposure",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": "360 min daily for as long as 4 wk (varied durations mentioned)"
    },
    "population": "Mice injected with breast cancer cells (luciferase-labeled)",
    "sample_size": null,
    "outcomes": [
        "Tumor growth",
        "Tumor viability",
        "Tumor progression (in vivo imaging)"
    ],
    "main_findings": "In mice injected with breast cancer cells, exposure to magnetic fields for 360 minutes daily for up to 4 weeks suppressed tumor growth, as monitored by an in vivo imaging system.",
    "effect_direction": "benefit",
    "limitations": [
        "Magnetic field parameters (e.g., intensity, frequency) not reported in abstract",
        "Sample size not reported in abstract",
        "Details on comparison/control conditions not reported in abstract",
        "Tumor viability results not described in detail in abstract"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "magnetic fields",
        "nonionizing",
        "breast cancer",
        "mouse model",
        "tumor growth",
        "tumor viability",
        "in vivo imaging",
        "luciferase"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": [
        {
            "slug": "animal-studies",
            "weight": 0.90000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,
            "reason": "Mouse tumor model evaluating magnetic field exposure effects on tumor growth."
        }
    ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.