Impact of non-ionising radiation of male fertility: a systematic review
Abstract
Impact of non-ionising radiation of male fertility: a systematic review Motchidlover L, Sari-Minodier I, Sunyach C, Metzler-Guillemain C, Perrin J. Impact of non-ionising radiation of male fertility: a systematic review. French Journal of Urology. 35(1), 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102800. Abstract Exposure to non-ionizing radiation has become inevitable because people cannot escape sources of electromagnetic fields, such as Wi-Fi or cell phones. Among the mechanisms mentioned, the energy emitted by this non-ionizing radiation could cause heating which would have harmful effects on semen quality. The objective of our study was to carry out a systematic review of the literature concerning the impact of exposure to non-ionizing radiation from mobile phones (or other sources) on sperm parameters. We selected 12 studies: the majority of in vivo studies in humans and in vitro studies in animals report a significant impact on sperm count, mobility and vitality. Mobility and vitality seem to be the parameters most regularly impacted by exposure to non-ionizing radiation. Additional studies are necessary to complete this study in order to deepen knowledge with new generations of mobile phones which can raise health concerns. sciencedirect.com
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
This systematic review included 12 studies and reports that most included in vivo human studies and in vitro animal studies found a significant impact of non-ionizing radiation exposure on sperm count, mobility, and vitality. Mobility and vitality were described as the most regularly impacted parameters.
Outcomes measured
- Sperm parameters
- Sperm count
- Sperm mobility
- Sperm vitality
- Semen quality
Limitations
- Only 12 studies were included.
- The abstract does not describe search strategy, inclusion criteria, risk-of-bias assessment, or quantitative synthesis.
- Exposure characteristics (frequency, intensity/SAR, duration, and source details) are not specified in the abstract.
- The abstract notes a need for additional studies, including with new generations of mobile phones.
Suggested hubs
-
cell-phones
(0.9) The review explicitly evaluates exposure from mobile phones and sperm parameters.
-
wifi
(0.55) Wi‑Fi is cited as an example source of electromagnetic fields in the abstract.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"publication_year": 2025,
"study_type": "systematic_review",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": "mobile phones (and other sources such as Wi‑Fi)",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Humans (in vivo) and animals (in vitro studies mentioned)",
"sample_size": 12,
"outcomes": [
"Sperm parameters",
"Sperm count",
"Sperm mobility",
"Sperm vitality",
"Semen quality"
],
"main_findings": "This systematic review included 12 studies and reports that most included in vivo human studies and in vitro animal studies found a significant impact of non-ionizing radiation exposure on sperm count, mobility, and vitality. Mobility and vitality were described as the most regularly impacted parameters.",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"Only 12 studies were included.",
"The abstract does not describe search strategy, inclusion criteria, risk-of-bias assessment, or quantitative synthesis.",
"Exposure characteristics (frequency, intensity/SAR, duration, and source details) are not specified in the abstract.",
"The abstract notes a need for additional studies, including with new generations of mobile phones."
],
"evidence_strength": "high",
"confidence": 0.7199999999999999733546474089962430298328399658203125,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"stance": "concern",
"stance_confidence": 0.7800000000000000266453525910037569701671600341796875,
"summary": "This systematic review assessed literature on non-ionizing radiation exposure (including mobile phones and other sources such as Wi‑Fi) and sperm parameters. Across 12 included studies, the authors report that most in vivo human and in vitro animal studies found significant impacts on sperm count, mobility, and vitality. Mobility and vitality were described as the most consistently affected outcomes, and the authors call for further research with newer generations of mobile phones.",
"key_points": [
"The review focused on non-ionizing radiation exposure from mobile phones and other sources and its impact on sperm parameters.",
"Twelve studies were included in the systematic review.",
"Most included studies reportedly found significant impacts on sperm count, mobility, and vitality.",
"Sperm mobility and vitality were described as the parameters most regularly impacted.",
"The abstract mentions heating as a potential mechanism affecting semen quality.",
"The authors state that additional studies are needed, including with newer generations of mobile phones."
],
"categories": [
"Reproductive Health",
"Cell Phones",
"WiFi",
"Systematic Reviews"
],
"tags": [
"Male Fertility",
"Semen Quality",
"Sperm Count",
"Sperm Motility",
"Sperm Vitality",
"Non-Ionizing Radiation",
"Electromagnetic Fields",
"Mobile Phones",
"Wi-Fi",
"Heating Mechanism",
"Systematic Review"
],
"keywords": [
"non-ionizing radiation",
"electromagnetic fields",
"mobile phones",
"Wi-Fi",
"male fertility",
"semen quality",
"sperm parameters",
"sperm count",
"motility",
"vitality",
"systematic review"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "cell-phones",
"weight": 0.90000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,
"reason": "The review explicitly evaluates exposure from mobile phones and sperm parameters."
},
{
"slug": "wifi",
"weight": 0.5500000000000000444089209850062616169452667236328125,
"reason": "Wi‑Fi is cited as an example source of electromagnetic fields in the abstract."
}
],
"social": {
"tweet": "Systematic review (12 studies) on non-ionizing radiation (mobile phones/other sources) reports most included human in vivo and animal in vitro studies found significant impacts on sperm count, motility, and vitality—motility/vitality most consistently affected. More research with newer phones needed.",
"facebook": "A systematic review in the French Journal of Urology examined 12 studies on non-ionizing radiation exposure (including mobile phones and other sources such as Wi‑Fi) and sperm parameters. The authors report that most included studies found significant impacts on sperm count, motility, and vitality, and they call for additional research with newer generations of mobile phones.",
"linkedin": "Systematic review (French Journal of Urology) of 12 studies on non-ionizing radiation exposure (mobile phones and other sources such as Wi‑Fi) reports that most included in vivo human and in vitro animal studies found significant impacts on sperm count, motility, and vitality, with motility and vitality most consistently affected. Authors highlight the need for further research with newer phone generations."
}
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.