Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

Cell phone usage and erectile function.

PAPER pubmed Central European journal of urology 2013 Case-control study Effect: harm Evidence: Very low

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this pilot study was to report our experience concerning the effects of cell phone usage on erectile function (EF) in men. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We recruited 20 consecutive men complaining of erectile dysfunction (ED) for at least six months (Group A), and another group of 10 healthy men with no complaints of ED (Group B). Anamnesis, basic laboratory investigations, and clinical examinations were performed. All men completed the German version of the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) for evaluation of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), as well as another questionnaire designed by our clinicians that assessed cell phone usage habits. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between both groups regarding age, weight, height, and total testosterone (Table 1). The SHIM scores of Group A were significantly lower than that of Group B, 11.2 ±5 and 24.2 ±2.3, respectively. Total time spent talking on the cell phone per week was not significantly higher in Group A over B, 17.6 ±11.1 vs. 12.5 ±7 hours. Men with ED were found to carry their 'switched on' cell phones for a significantly longer time than those without ED, 4.4 ±3.6 vs. 1.8 ±1 hours per day. CONCLUSIONS: We found a potential correlation with cell phone usage and a negative impact on EF. Further large-scale studies confirming our initial data and exploring the mechanisms involved in this phenomenon are recommended.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Case-control study
Effect direction
harm
Population
Men with erectile dysfunction (ED) for at least six months and healthy men without ED complaints
Sample size
30
Exposure
RF mobile phone · Self-reported weekly talking time (hours/week) and daily time carrying a switched-on phone (hours/day)
Evidence strength
Very low
Confidence: 74% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

In this pilot study (20 men with ED vs 10 healthy controls), total weekly time spent talking on a cell phone did not differ significantly between groups. Men with ED reported carrying a switched-on cell phone for significantly longer per day than men without ED (4.4 ± 3.6 vs 1.8 ± 1 hours/day). The authors conclude there may be a potential correlation between cell phone usage and negative impact on erectile function.

Outcomes measured

  • Erectile function (SHIM/IIEF score)
  • Erectile dysfunction status (ED vs no ED)

Limitations

  • Pilot study with small sample size (n=30)
  • Observational comparison; causality cannot be established
  • Cell phone usage assessed by questionnaire/self-report
  • Exposure metrics limited (no frequency/SAR or objective RF measurements reported)
  • Potential confounding not described in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "case_control",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "RF",
        "source": "mobile phone",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": "Self-reported weekly talking time (hours/week) and daily time carrying a switched-on phone (hours/day)"
    },
    "population": "Men with erectile dysfunction (ED) for at least six months and healthy men without ED complaints",
    "sample_size": 30,
    "outcomes": [
        "Erectile function (SHIM/IIEF score)",
        "Erectile dysfunction status (ED vs no ED)"
    ],
    "main_findings": "In this pilot study (20 men with ED vs 10 healthy controls), total weekly time spent talking on a cell phone did not differ significantly between groups. Men with ED reported carrying a switched-on cell phone for significantly longer per day than men without ED (4.4 ± 3.6 vs 1.8 ± 1 hours/day). The authors conclude there may be a potential correlation between cell phone usage and negative impact on erectile function.",
    "effect_direction": "harm",
    "limitations": [
        "Pilot study with small sample size (n=30)",
        "Observational comparison; causality cannot be established",
        "Cell phone usage assessed by questionnaire/self-report",
        "Exposure metrics limited (no frequency/SAR or objective RF measurements reported)",
        "Potential confounding not described in abstract"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "very_low",
    "confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "mobile phone",
        "cell phone",
        "radiofrequency",
        "erectile dysfunction",
        "erectile function",
        "SHIM",
        "IIEF",
        "case-control",
        "self-reported exposure"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.