Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

Genotoxic and histopathological effects of 6 GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on rat liver tissue

PAPER manual Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 2025 Animal study Effect: mixed Evidence: Low

Abstract

Category: Toxicology, Experimental Biology Tags: RF-EMR, liver, genotoxicity, histopathology, 6 GHz, electromagnetic fields, rats DOI: 10.1080/15368378.2025.2534381 URL: tandfonline.com Overview This study investigated the genotoxic and histopathological effects of 6 GHz (0.065 W/kg) Radiofrequency-Electromagnetic Radiation (RF-EMR) on rat liver tissue. A sham (control) group and a Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) group, each with 10 adult male rats, were utilized for this experiment. The sham group received no treatment. The RFR group was subjected to 6 GHz RF-EMR for 4 hours per day over a period of 42 days. Findings - After exposure, liver tissues from both groups were examined. - Genotoxicity was assessed using the Comet Test, while Masson Trichrome and Hematoxylin Eosin staining methods were used for histopathological analysis. - The RFR group showed higher values in genetic damage index (GDI) and damaged cell percentage (DCP) compared to the sham group, though this increase was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). - Histopathologically, the RFR group exhibited more prominent portal inflammation, single cell necrosis, vascularity, and congestion relative to the control. Conclusion This study demonstrates that 6 GHz RF-EMR exposure can cause histopathological and DNA-level changes in rat liver tissue. Notably, there were no prior studies specifically evaluating the genotoxic and histopathological effects of 6 GHz RF-EMR, highlighting the significance of the biological impacts of this frequency band.

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Animal study
Effect direction
mixed
Population
Adult male rats
Sample size
20
Exposure
RF · 6000 MHz · 0.065 W/kg · 4 hours/day for 42 days
Evidence strength
Low
Confidence: 78% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

Compared with sham controls, the exposed group had higher genetic damage index and damaged cell percentage, but differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Histopathological findings in the exposed group were described as more prominent portal inflammation, single cell necrosis, vascularity, and congestion.

Outcomes measured

  • Genotoxicity (Comet test; genetic damage index, damaged cell percentage)
  • Histopathology of liver tissue (Masson Trichrome; Hematoxylin Eosin; portal inflammation, single cell necrosis, vascularity, congestion)

Limitations

  • Genotoxicity increases were not statistically significant (p>0.05).
  • Small group sizes (10 rats per group).
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "animal",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "RF",
        "source": null,
        "frequency_mhz": 6000,
        "sar_wkg": 0.065000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,
        "duration": "4 hours/day for 42 days"
    },
    "population": "Adult male rats",
    "sample_size": 20,
    "outcomes": [
        "Genotoxicity (Comet test; genetic damage index, damaged cell percentage)",
        "Histopathology of liver tissue (Masson Trichrome; Hematoxylin Eosin; portal inflammation, single cell necrosis, vascularity, congestion)"
    ],
    "main_findings": "Compared with sham controls, the exposed group had higher genetic damage index and damaged cell percentage, but differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Histopathological findings in the exposed group were described as more prominent portal inflammation, single cell necrosis, vascularity, and congestion.",
    "effect_direction": "mixed",
    "limitations": [
        "Genotoxicity increases were not statistically significant (p>0.05).",
        "Small group sizes (10 rats per group)."
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "low",
    "confidence": 0.7800000000000000266453525910037569701671600341796875,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "6 GHz",
        "RF-EMR",
        "radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation",
        "rat",
        "liver",
        "genotoxicity",
        "Comet assay",
        "histopathology",
        "SAR 0.065 W/kg"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.