Weak anthropogenic electric fields affect honeybee foraging
Abstract
Category: Ecology Tags: electromagnetic fields, honeybees, pollination, electric pollution, foraging behavior, AC fields, DC fields DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112550 URL: cell.com Overview Aerial electroreception, or the detection of airborne electric fields (E-fields), is a recently recognized sensory system in arthropods such as bees. Bees utilize floral E-fields as foraging cues, but the potential impact of anthropogenic (human-made) E-fields on these critical interactions has been largely unexplored. Findings - 🌼 Weak anthropogenic-like electric fields reduce honeybee floral landing rates. - ⚡ Both alternating current (AC) and positive direct current (DC) fields deter honeybee landings—with reductions of 71% and 53%, respectively. - ➖ Negative DC fields show no statistically significant effect on honeybee landing behavior. - 🏞️ Experimentally measured electric fields near high-voltage power lines match those that affected bees, extending across tens of meters at foraging-relevant heights. Conclusion These findings reveal an important link between electric pollution and the potential disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. The alteration of bee foraging by anthropogenic E-fields poses risks to pollination efficiency — threatening agriculture and biodiversity. The study urgently calls for more research on the ecological impacts of electric pollution.
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
Weak anthropogenic-like electric fields reduced honeybee floral landing rates. Both AC and positive DC fields deterred landings (reported reductions 71% and 53%, respectively), while negative DC fields showed no statistically significant effect. Experimentally measured electric fields near high-voltage power lines matched those that affected bees and extended across tens of meters at foraging-relevant heights.
Outcomes measured
- floral landing rates
- landing/foraging behavior
- plant-pollinator interactions (pollination efficiency; inferred as potential impact)
Limitations
- Sample size not reported in provided abstract/metadata
- Exposure metrics (field strength values, exact frequencies for AC, and exposure duration) not provided in the provided abstract/metadata
- Details on experimental design, controls, and statistical methods not provided in the provided abstract/metadata
Suggested hubs
-
occupational-exposure
(0.2) Mentions high-voltage power lines as a real-world source of electric fields; relevance is environmental/near-infrastructure rather than occupational, so low weight.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": "high-voltage power lines (anthropogenic electric fields)",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Honeybees",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"floral landing rates",
"landing/foraging behavior",
"plant-pollinator interactions (pollination efficiency; inferred as potential impact)"
],
"main_findings": "Weak anthropogenic-like electric fields reduced honeybee floral landing rates. Both AC and positive DC fields deterred landings (reported reductions 71% and 53%, respectively), while negative DC fields showed no statistically significant effect. Experimentally measured electric fields near high-voltage power lines matched those that affected bees and extended across tens of meters at foraging-relevant heights.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not reported in provided abstract/metadata",
"Exposure metrics (field strength values, exact frequencies for AC, and exposure duration) not provided in the provided abstract/metadata",
"Details on experimental design, controls, and statistical methods not provided in the provided abstract/metadata"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.7399999999999999911182158029987476766109466552734375,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"electric fields",
"anthropogenic electric fields",
"electric pollution",
"honeybees",
"foraging behavior",
"floral landing",
"AC fields",
"DC fields",
"power lines",
"pollination"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0.200000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,
"reason": "Mentions high-voltage power lines as a real-world source of electric fields; relevance is environmental/near-infrastructure rather than occupational, so low weight."
}
]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.