Share
𝕏 Facebook LinkedIn

Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation

PAPER manual Biomed Res Int 2017 Meta-analysis Effect: harm Evidence: Moderate

Abstract

Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation Carlberg M, Hardell L. Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9218486. doi: 10.1155/2017/9218486. Abstract Objective. Bradford Hill's viewpoints from 1965 on association or causation were used on glioma risk and use of mobile or cordless phones. Methods. All nine viewpoints were evaluated based on epidemiology and laboratory studies. Results. Strength: meta-analysis of case-control studies gave odds ratio (OR) = 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.31-2.76 with highest cumulative exposure. Consistency: the risk increased with latency, meta- analysis gave in the 10+ years' latency group OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.20-2.19. Specificity: increased risk for glioma was in the temporal lobe. Using meningioma cases as comparison group still increased the risk. Temporality: highest risk was in the 20+ years' latency group, OR = 2.01, 95% CI =1.41-2.88, for wireless phones. Biological gradient: cumulative use of wireless phones increased the risk. Plausibility: animal studies showed an increased incidence of glioma and malignant schwannoma in rats exposed to radiofrequency (RF) radiation. There is increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from RF radiation. Coherence: there is a change in the natural history of glioma and increasing incidence. Experiment: antioxidants reduced ROS production from RF radiation. Analogy: there is an increased risk in subjects exposed to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Conclusion. RF radiation should be regarded as a human carcinogen causing glioma. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

AI evidence extraction

At a glance
Study type
Meta-analysis
Effect direction
harm
Population
Sample size
Exposure
RF mobile phone, cordless phone · 10+ years latency, 20+ years latency, cumulative use
Evidence strength
Moderate
Confidence: 80% · Peer-reviewed: yes

Main findings

Meta-analysis of case-control studies showed increased glioma risk with highest cumulative exposure (OR=1.90) and increased risk with longer latency (10+ years OR=1.62; 20+ years OR=2.01). Risk was specific to temporal lobe. Animal studies showed increased glioma incidence and ROS production from RF exposure. Antioxidants reduced ROS production. Evidence supports RF radiation as a human carcinogen causing glioma.

Outcomes measured

  • glioma risk

Suggested hubs

  • who-icnirp (0.9)
    Study evaluates RF radiation carcinogenicity relevant to WHO/ICNIRP guidelines.
View raw extracted JSON
{
    "study_type": "meta_analysis",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "RF",
        "source": "mobile phone, cordless phone",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": "10+ years latency, 20+ years latency, cumulative use"
    },
    "population": null,
    "sample_size": null,
    "outcomes": [
        "glioma risk"
    ],
    "main_findings": "Meta-analysis of case-control studies showed increased glioma risk with highest cumulative exposure (OR=1.90) and increased risk with longer latency (10+ years OR=1.62; 20+ years OR=2.01). Risk was specific to temporal lobe. Animal studies showed increased glioma incidence and ROS production from RF exposure. Antioxidants reduced ROS production. Evidence supports RF radiation as a human carcinogen causing glioma.",
    "effect_direction": "harm",
    "limitations": [],
    "evidence_strength": "moderate",
    "confidence": 0.8000000000000000444089209850062616169452667236328125,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
    "keywords": [
        "glioma",
        "mobile phone",
        "cordless phone",
        "radiofrequency radiation",
        "Bradford Hill criteria",
        "carcinogen"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": [
        {
            "slug": "who-icnirp",
            "weight": 0.90000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,
            "reason": "Study evaluates RF radiation carcinogenicity relevant to WHO/ICNIRP guidelines."
        }
    ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

Log in to comment.

No comments yet.