Response to the letter to the editor regarding “Mobile phone use and brain tumour risk − COSMOS, a

PAPER manual Environment International 2024 Other Effect: unclear Evidence: Insufficient

Read original paper → DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108664 Evidence Lab

Abstract

Response to the letter to the editor regarding “Mobile phone use and brain tumour risk − COSMOS, a prospective cohort study” Feychting M, Schüz J, Toledano MB, Vermeulen R, Auvinen A, Poulsen AH, Deltour I, Smith RB, Heller J, Kromhout H, Huss A, Johansen C, Tettamanti G, Elliott P. Response to the Letter to the Editor regarding "Mobile phone use and brain tumour risk - COSMOS, a prospective cohort study". Environ Int. 2024 May;187:108664. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108664. No abstract Open access paper: sciencedirect.com

AI evidence extraction

At a glance

Study type

Other

Effect direction

unclear

Population

—

Sample size

—

Exposure

RF mobile phone

Evidence strength

Insufficient

Confidence: 42% · Peer-reviewed: unknown

Outcomes measured

brain tumour risk

Limitations

No abstract provided; study details and results not available in the supplied text.

View raw extracted JSON

{
    "study_type": "other",
    "exposure": {
        "band": "RF",
        "source": "mobile phone",
        "frequency_mhz": null,
        "sar_wkg": null,
        "duration": null
    },
    "population": null,
    "sample_size": null,
    "outcomes": [
        "brain tumour risk"
    ],
    "main_findings": null,
    "effect_direction": "unclear",
    "limitations": [
        "No abstract provided; study details and results not available in the supplied text."
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
    "confidence": 0.419999999999999984456877655247808434069156646728515625,
    "peer_reviewed_likely": "unknown",
    "keywords": [
        "mobile phone use",
        "brain tumour",
        "COSMOS",
        "prospective cohort",
        "letter to the editor",
        "response"
    ],
    "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract/metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice.

Comments

No comments yet.