Residential extremely low frequency magnetic fields and skin cancer
Abstract
Residential extremely low frequency magnetic fields and skin cancer Muhammad Waseem Khan, Jukka Juutilainen, Jonne Naarala, Päivi Roivainen. Residential extremely low frequency magnetic fields and skin cancer. Occup Environ Med. 2021 Sep 30;oemed-2021-107776. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107776. Abstract Objective: Photoinduced radical reactions have a fundamental role in skin cancer induced by ultraviolet radiation, and changes in radical reactions have also been proposed as a mechanism for the putative carcinogenic effects of extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields (MFs). We assessed the association of melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma with residential MF exposure. Methods: All cohort members had lived in buildings with indoor transformer stations (TSs) during the period from 1971 to 2016. MF exposure was assessed based on apartment location. Out of the 225 492 individuals, 8617 (149 291 person-years of follow-up) living in apartments next to TSs were considered as exposed, while individuals living on higher floors of the same buildings were considered as referents. Associations between MF exposure and skin cancers were examined using Cox proportional hazard models. Results: The HR for MF exposure ≥6 month was 1.05 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.53) for melanoma and 0.94 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.61) for squamous cell carcinoma. Analysis of the age at the start of residence showed an elevated HR (2.55, 95% CI 1.15 to 5.69) for melanoma among those who lived in the apartments when they were less than 15 years old. This finding was based on seven exposed cases. Conclusions: The results of this study suggested an association between childhood ELF MF exposure and adult melanoma. This is in agreement with previous findings suggesting that the carcinogenic effects of ELF MFs may be associated particularly with childhood exposure pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
AI evidence extraction
Main findings
For MF exposure ≥6 months, hazard ratios were 1.05 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.53) for melanoma and 0.94 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.61) for squamous cell carcinoma. An analysis by age at start of residence found an elevated melanoma HR of 2.55 (95% CI 1.15 to 5.69) among those who began living in exposed apartments before age 15, based on seven exposed cases.
Outcomes measured
- melanoma
- squamous cell carcinoma
Limitations
- Exposure assessment based on apartment location (proxy measure; no direct measurements reported in abstract)
- Childhood-exposure subgroup finding based on seven exposed melanoma cases
- Exposed group defined as apartments next to transformer stations; referents were higher floors in same buildings (potential residual confounding not described in abstract)
Suggested hubs
-
occupational-exposure
(0.15) Published in an occupational/environmental medicine journal, but exposure described is residential rather than occupational.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "cohort",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": "residential (indoor transformer stations in buildings)",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "≥6 months (main analysis); also stratified by age at start of residence"
},
"population": "Cohort members living in buildings with indoor transformer stations (1971–2016)",
"sample_size": 225492,
"outcomes": [
"melanoma",
"squamous cell carcinoma"
],
"main_findings": "For MF exposure ≥6 months, hazard ratios were 1.05 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.53) for melanoma and 0.94 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.61) for squamous cell carcinoma. An analysis by age at start of residence found an elevated melanoma HR of 2.55 (95% CI 1.15 to 5.69) among those who began living in exposed apartments before age 15, based on seven exposed cases.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Exposure assessment based on apartment location (proxy measure; no direct measurements reported in abstract)",
"Childhood-exposure subgroup finding based on seven exposed melanoma cases",
"Exposed group defined as apartments next to transformer stations; referents were higher floors in same buildings (potential residual confounding not described in abstract)"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.7800000000000000266453525910037569701671600341796875,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"extremely low frequency",
"ELF",
"magnetic fields",
"residential exposure",
"indoor transformer station",
"melanoma",
"squamous cell carcinoma",
"skin cancer",
"cohort",
"Cox proportional hazards"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0.1499999999999999944488848768742172978818416595458984375,
"reason": "Published in an occupational/environmental medicine journal, but exposure described is residential rather than occupational."
}
]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.
Comments
Log in to comment.
No comments yet.