Evidence on RF-EMF and cancer in animals misjudged: methodological and analytical flaws in the Mevissen et al. systematic review
Research
RF Safe Research Library
Jan 1, 2025
No abstract was provided. From the title and supplied overview, this paper critiques the Mevissen et al. systematic review on RF-EMF exposure and cancer in animal studies, asserting that methodological and analytical flaws led to misjudgment of the evidence. The provided text frames the topic as requiring careful…
The Systematic Review on RF-EMF Exposure and Cancer by Karipidis et al. (2024) has Serious Flaws that Undermine the Validity of the Study's Conclusions
Research
RF Safe Research Library
Jan 1, 2024
This letter critiques the WHO-sponsored systematic review by Karipidis et al. (2024) on RF-EMF exposure and cancer risk. The authors argue the review has serious methodological and interpretative flaws, including issues with study selection and data analysis. They contend that the review’s conclusion of "no clear…