Archive
3 postsFilters: tag: emf Clear
MBFC’s Misrepresentation: Straight-Up Lying or Just Sloppy?
RF Safe criticizes Media Bias Fact Check (MBFC) for labeling RF Safe as “pseudoscience” with “mixed factual reporting” and “low credibility,” arguing MBFC’s entry contains factual errors and misrepresentations. The post says RF Safe does not claim RF radiation definitively causes human disease, but instead presents precautionary interpretations of peer-reviewed studies and proposed non-thermal mechanisms. It also alleges MBFC made specific, checkable mistakes about study-linking practices and site ownership/funding, and failed to correct them after rebuttals.
Electromagnetic Fields as a Weak Magnetic Co‑Zeitgeber for the Body Clock
This RF Safe article argues that everyday electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could act as a weak “magnetic co‑zeitgeber,” subtly influencing circadian timing alongside light. It proposes a mechanism in which EMFs modulate cryptochrome radical‑pair spin dynamics, potentially nudging circadian phase and downstream processes such as melatonin rhythms, immune function, epigenetic programming, and DNA repair. The piece presents the idea as a framework with testable implications while acknowledging uncertainties, but it is primarily explanatory/commentary rather than reporting new study results.
Electrohypersensitivity: what is belief and what is known?
This article addresses electrohypersensitivity (EHS) in the context of public health and EMF-related health concerns. It focuses on distinguishing beliefs about EMF effects from what is currently supported by scientific evidence. The provided text notes ongoing debate and concern and calls for critical assessment of both beliefs and empirical findings.