{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6582","number":"6582","name":"Eleonora Gontcharova","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-28T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-21T04:00Z","body":"Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.\n\nThere are many ways electromagnetically intense environment can affect physical state of a human, aside from a direct hit by concentrated electromagnetic beam or a 'parcel' of concentrated energy emanating from a communication tower, which has been experienced in Denver, CO (2008) and a small town in Wisconsin (2013) where a Data Center is no being built. \n \nAside from direct exposure to radiation, coverage creates opportunity for interaction with equipment, particularly digital equipment. For example, manipulation of blood pressure measuring devices are well known and happen routinely to personal devices, as well as those in hospitals, or those provided by pharmacies, was found as a result of direct experience and observation of other people reaction and comments.  \n\nWhereas towers are usually cited as a threat, I find that intensity of wireless coverage caused uninterrupted interference with my physical health in our neighborhood in Wisconsin town of Grand Chute from 2010 through 2020. \nSince 2021 it got only more intense by the year, and that after we moved from a coverage intense neighborhood at previous address. \nThe interference with physical health at those locations is more complex than simplistic statements about radiation, - density of coverage is more appropriate term for understanding of the matter.\n\nI am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.\n","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6582","tags":["sleep-cognition","exposure-places"],"source_hash":"df7af3eec66dfd1f9136c0ea00c1ac5990656a906c4ddaadcc68ed3ea794eac5","slug":"sleep-cognition-comment-6582","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6582","body_sha256":"94b55d53f29e1f1713105b64a5d9bfaa560ad4a034b9d07737cef2c0105af0fa","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"directed","topics":[{"id":"directed","evidence":"direct hit by concentrated electromagnetic beam"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"emanating from a communication tower"},{"id":"other","evidence":"manipulation of blood pressure measuring devices"}],"summary":"The commenter attributes health problems to dense wireless coverage and alleged concentrated-energy exposure, and alleges interference with digital blood-pressure instruments. They emphasize coverage intensity rather than tower proximity alone.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"f006d74f5bd3f9d0d3095d6a4d27f4745a679d4816a2d6e9f93eddbec1acc337","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["directed","infrastructure","other"],"primary_topic":"directed","forum_title":"The commenter attributes health problems to dense wireless coverage and alleged concentrated-energy expos…"}