{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4513","body_sha256":"08efd0dd6662e7a76715b6d336cc010b709151b18a2b00aaaa7a57ac20fc592b","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"privacy","topics":[{"id":"privacy","evidence":"ued discussion regarding:\n\nCognitive Liberty\nMental Privacy\nNeuro-Autonomy\nBrain-Computer Interface Governance\nArtificial In"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"ance\nMedical Internet of Things Transparency\nHuman Subject Protection Modernization\nFederal Neurotechnology Policy Development\n\nThe goal of this sub"},{"id":"research","evidence":"thical questions, and areas that may warrant additional scientific investigation and public-health review.\n\nRespectfully Submitted,\n\nLewis Scott "},{"id":"children","evidence":"ro-autonomy, informed consent modernization, enhanced protections for vulnerable populations, and increased transparency regarding technologies capable of in"}],"summary":"An advocacy organization proposes a neuro-rights framework for emerging interfaces, AI and physiological telemetry, requesting modernized consent, privacy protections and oversight while stating that it is not establishing a specific causal mechanism.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-24T20:09:12Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"ce82efd579639f3ee178cb1670e902790c624bbde88a40c7045c92b70cd63fc2","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}