{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3378","number":"3378","name":"Greg Nivek","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-17T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-11T04:00Z","body":"A century+ of actual scientific research has categorized the risks of electromagnetic radiation adequately. It's why we (for now) have OSHA, etc. Fear-mongering from untrained folks (RFKj, especially) helps no one.","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3378","tags":["research-evidence"],"source_hash":"ba62d488531e5a9f69f08debefc9fa6f2705a66e2fc4f287ba6101b707022d0a","slug":"research-evidence-comment-3378","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3378","body_sha256":"2a35db52f8134c57204fb8463804f7c7a0431d24ab231b5c9645db647544656d","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"A century+ of actual scientific research has categorized the risks of electromagnetic radiation adequatel"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"ation adequately. It's why we (for now) have OSHA, etc. Fear-mongering from untrained folks (RFKj, especially) hel"}],"summary":"Argues that existing research adequately characterizes electromagnetic risks and criticizes alarmist public messaging.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-17T20:52:40Z","review_method":"Source-based AI review of complete published bodies; neutral attribution and exact topic evidence.","review_source_sha256":"5d3ce4cd55391635e9733d1f2661e6d1e136c6349e112f9390d5ec1332396c80","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["research","standards"],"primary_topic":"research","forum_title":"Argues that existing research adequately characterizes electromagnetic risks and criticizes alarmist publ…"}