{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2148","number":"2148","name":"John Smillie","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-09T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-09T04:00Z","body":"This is so stupid. Why are you seeking public input on conspiracy theory nonsense? What could this possibly achieve?\n\nThe scientific evidence has been looked at. It's fine, as one would expect from non-ionizing radiation! We are bombarded by non-ionizing radiation from the sun every day at mich higher intensities and frequencies! It's called visible light!\n\nhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-021-00297-6","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2148","tags":["research-evidence"],"source_hash":"7080f03fb27b730fe7dc5fe22fb3b1423eefe877a749b8e7d496a0cb2ef02a08","slug":"research-evidence-comment-2148","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2148","body_sha256":"cfb78941dc13d3d363219a7a553bd48ed2d00748939b563ca938988545c644e9","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"ense? What could this possibly achieve?\n\nThe scientific evidence has been looked at. It's fine, as one would expect fro"}],"summary":"Criticizes the inquiry and argues that scientific evidence supports the safety of non-ionizing exposure.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-10T00:02:05Z","review_method":"Complete published comment-body review; identical previously reviewed bodies reused with separate official IDs preserved. Attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"92ab1ce2e7408840bf72f4129bdc0047f21cff865140ea06d63bc0776471633e","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["research"],"primary_topic":"research","forum_title":"Criticizes the inquiry and argues that scientific evidence supports the safety of non-ionizing exposure."}