{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5878","body_sha256":"29453679d7399ac1c0d561b6b3fb3d9e35d0200f412e5945eac9b129493e70e3","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"ended by ICNIRP and IEEE ICES which underpin current exposure limits and will form the basis for future recommendations, as these ass"},{"id":"research","evidence":"th scientific colleagues, developed a set of assessment criteria we consider necessary to improve the regulatory regime. These cr"},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"urmountable evidentiary threshold before any non-thermal effect is given evidentiary weight, with serious consequences when sett"}],"summary":"The commenter critiques methods underlying ICNIRP and IEEE assessments and proposes criteria for evaluating nonthermal evidence, exposure relevance and uncertainty, asking HHS to assess reviews against these criteria before relying on them.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T16:50:58Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"468fdad9f305ef9640ff469944400b8b8c61da2b60bccad9aed231ebcfaca530","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}