{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3003","body_sha256":"0d1e9ec463e69d78da6f8a82aa8f8b28cf714333287a54db51ae982d05c30963","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":" entirely to high-standard, independent systematic reviews conducted by recognized scientific bodies (such as the Nati"},{"id":"standards","evidence":").\nIf HHS genuinely intends to evaluate exposure standards, it must anchor its framework in objective, methodologicall"}],"summary":"Calls for policy grounded in rigorous empirical research and independent systematic reviews and criticizes using public comments to evaluate technical health questions.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-15T03:51:16Z","review_method":"Source-based AI review of complete published comment bodies; exact topic evidence; attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"123211ab102e722ad914836a9df2d96ddfbc94a08269202ef5ef1a45287baea4","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}