{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-1697","number":"1697","name":"Greg Temmer","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-06T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-06T04:00Z","body":"The Telecommunications Act of 1996 Section 704, needs to be challenged as being unconstitutional, and needs to be challenged in the Supreme Court of the United States of America.  Specifically what needs to be challenged in the Telecommunications Act is the “environmental effects”.\n\n “SEC. 704. FACILITIES SITING; RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSION STANDARDS… (iv) No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such emissions.”\n\nI remember visiting the Thomas Jefferson Memorial in 1996.  I read all the quotes etched in stone inside the beautiful memorial to a great man.   A few years ago, I remembered one that was so significant,  \"I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.\" - Thomas Jefferson\n\nEven though, Jefferson could never have imagined what life would be like 200 years in the future.  This quote covers it.\n\nThis wireless insanity is tyranny over the minds of all of us.  Tyranny shows up in all sorts of forms and repression, and this invisible wireless stuff is in the category of \"every form of tyranny over the mind of man.\"\n\nIn the Declaration of Independence, it says \"We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.\"\n\nAnd then I needed to put it all together....and then Martin Pall's journal article came out \"Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression\".\nThis was the missing piece to the challenging of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, specifically Section 704.\n\nOur Constitutional rights are being denied because this is Tyranny over the minds of Men, and we have the inalienable right to the pursuit of happiness, and since wireless technology causes depression and unhappiness in the minds of men, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Section 704  is therefore unconstitutional and a direct violation of our inalienable rights!\n\n And on a related quote from history.\n\n To Joseph Priestley    \"...for I believe in my conscience that Mankind are wicked enough to continue slaughtring one another as long as they can find Money to pay the Butchers. \" - Benjamin Franklin\n\nEnough!\n\nThe Telecommunications Act of 1996  Section 704, needs to be challenged as being unconstitutional, and needs to be challenged in the Supreme Court of the United States of America!!\n\nIf we as a civilization, continue down this path of insanity, there will be no future. What we are all facing is a \"Technological Holocaust\" (I coined this phrase) because our governments are run by corporations, and the corporations are run by men and women who are self-serving money driver sycophants.\n","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-1697","tags":["policy-standards"],"source_hash":"719ae967150d45318e4c21a03467ff828e86fd221865e7523ec52b5ba2625069","slug":"policy-standards-comment-1697","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-1697","body_sha256":"b1f208f27a1cc25324f21509562ae32736037085ee86eed11eedea03dd827e46","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"section-704","topics":[{"id":"section-704","evidence":"The Telecommunications Act of 1996 Section 704, needs to be challenged as being unconstitutional, and"},{"id":"neurological","evidence":"idespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression\".\nThis was the missing piece to the challenging of the"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"itutional, and needs to be challenged in the Supreme Court of the United States of America.  Specifically what ne"}],"summary":"Calls for a constitutional challenge to Section 704, arguing that restrictions on local consideration of RF effects conflict with individual rights and citing a paper on neuropsychiatric effects.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-07T00:52:21Z","review_method":"Complete published comment-body review with exact supporting passages; attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"3e85b72c79528118562eb281662d2b26f2a0326150b50d5096edfcea068cbc57","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["section-704","neurological","standards"],"primary_topic":"section-704","forum_title":"Calls for a constitutional challenge to Section 704, arguing that restrictions on local consideration of …"}