{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-0913","number":"0913","name":"Anthony Cotton","organization":"","posted":"2026-09-25T04:00Z","received":"2026-09-25T04:00Z","body":"\nIntroduction\n-------------\nMy name is Anthony Cotton and I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure (EMR).\n\nBackground\n----------\nMy comments are supported by my background as a Chemical Engineer with training and experience in a number of relevant areas; Energy - (oil & gas, electrical, Solar), IT - web development consulting for numerous Fortune 100 companies (banks, pharma, tech, research as well as Federal Agencies). My more recent focus has been a broad study of Human Health - specific to this topic, my certification as an EMRS (Electromagnetic Radiation Specialist) from the Building Biology Institute.\n\nAnalysis\n-------\nThe dramatic escalation in the pervasiveness and intensity of people's unseen EMF environment (both public and private) is both unprecedented and unwise. Regulatory agency assurances of \"safety\" are deceptive at best and malevolent at worst. Premised on the assertion that only EMR energy levels high enough to cause tissue heating would be of concern is absurd and flies in the face of voluminous evidence to the contrary. Biological impacts from very subtle energetic environments are well documented... EMR effects are not dose dependent. \n\nAs one single point of reference for evidence of EMR's biological effects, I would point to the \"BioIniiative Report\" at the following link;\n\nhttps://bioinitiative.org/\n\nConclusion\n----------\nThe Truth regarding EMR human health effects can only be pursued if the government is Truly \"Of the people, by the people and for the people\".\n\n\n\n\n\n","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-0913","tags":["policy-standards","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"1cac7052c58f107ea68a23d7a9376410bcb1dbd728973dc30cf78f9272593441","slug":"policy-standards-comment-0913","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-0913","body_sha256":"9e13fe24b04e6434c015f3ec245db1f6a20f9a5fa2f1519cd7c8b90955319620","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"rst. Premised on the assertion that only EMR energy levels high enough to cause tissue heating would be of concern is absurd and flies in the face of voluminous evidence to the contrary. Biologi"},{"id":"research","evidence":"nt of reference for evidence of EMR's biological effects, I would point to the \"BioIniiative Report\" at the following link;\n\nhttps://bioinitiative.org/\n\nConclusion\n----------\nThe Truth regarding EMR "}],"summary":"A self-described chemical engineer and EMR specialist challenges heating-based safety assurances and cites the BioInitiative Report as support for biological effects. The linked material has not been reviewed.","reviewed_at":"2026-09-26T00:33:07Z","review_method":"Source-matched AI review of 50 complete new comment bodies; four attachment-only submissions remain pending. Exact supporting passages; attachments not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"801be3ef3a6d86d143f1bb5e56969bb9831e115d4c2b3a17445a9276fd807e49","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["standards","research"],"primary_topic":"standards","forum_title":"A self-described chemical engineer and EMR specialist challenges heating-based safety assurances and cite…"}