{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6105","body_sha256":"8462a8d2eced845836ba94b63113378eb4158b5544cfe87cc92ce392dd1a1b35","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"ghlights the importance of assessing whether current regulatory standards adequately address real-world exposure conditions and individual"},{"id":"research","evidence":"s across different frequency ranges. Further independent research and appropriately precautionary safety margins could help clarif"},{"id":"neurological","evidence":" has experienced localized physiological and neurological symptoms associated with ambient and near-field electromagnetic environme"},{"id":"optical","evidence":"lly, disabling wireless interfaces and using wired connections may reduce radiofrequency emissions, but electronic devices cont"},{"id":"electricity","evidence":" but electronic devices continue to generate low-frequency electromagnetic fields, heat, and other electrical emissions. I therefore recommend tha"}],"summary":"Reports symptoms in electromagnetic environments and recommends realistic multi-radio testing, assessment of enclosed spaces and environmental interactions, and independent research.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"9673fac959eb001abc4a40bb4248e5a9ae8746867cfdb5e11d38698c34a5f071","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}