{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5886","number":"5886","name":"Mohamed Gabr","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-28T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-20T04:00Z","body":"The key word in the RFI is the word “scientific”; it is repeated eleven time in different contexts as the main motive is to “Understand”; it is mentioned in the RFI: “At the same time, scientific literature is extensive, technically complex, and not always easy for policymakers or public health stakeholders to interpret.”\n\nThis comment is from a care giver perspective; an independent healer offering services to Harmonize/Balance contaminated areas, places, devices (smart or not) with EMF and RF. The outcome of this so called (Harmonization/Balancing) is the disappearing or the dramatic improvement of the adverse health effects experienced by suffering people living in these places or using these devices.\n\nThe approach used for Harmonization/Balancing is a \"Holistic\" approach, considered as Pseudoscience by the contemporary main scientific community, it is called (Physical Radiesthesia): a modality created by independent French researchers in the 1930’s, it works on the subtle effects/planes of the EMF, RF and the Human Subtle Energy Field, i.e. the physical measurements of EMF & RF rest unchanged after the Harmonization.\n\nThe RFI is asking the following questions:\n \n5.o. Is additional research needed to develop, test, and evaluate the effectiveness of procedures and techniques for minimizing exposure to electronic product radiation? Where are the largest gaps, if any, in knowledge?\n\n16. What are the highest priority research gaps regarding EMF and RF radiation and public health that the federal health agencies should address?\n\nThe answer is Yes, the gaps in knowledge is to embrace this different paradigm shift with an open and new mind; I personally have published scientific articles (in another field) in top peer reviewed journal in Physics, therefore “I have been there and actually I am still there in terms of awareness of the scientific rigorous process”; so, the scientific path of researching and publishing \"shall\" start shedding light on this modality (or other Holistic approaches) without prejudgment.\n\nOn another note, the big challenge of the EMF & RF adverse health effects is that most of it are “subjective” in its core nature; the Physical symptoms (such as chronic fatigue, muscle aches, or digestive distress) are \"invisible/intangible\" by the standard medical tests as it shows no underlying organic disease or structural damage!\n\nThe good news is that there a large similarity between the EMF & RF adverse health effects and Psychosomatic conditions that lack clear and tangible medical causes; so, we don’t have to start from scratch or to invent the wheel! \nThe Standardized Questionnaires which are Medical approved tools like the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15) or the Screening for Somatic Symptom Disorders (SOMS-7) translate subjective physical complaints into quantifiable scientific data.\n \n(This was the answer of the question 8. from the RFI)\n8. What, if any, improvements in exposure assessment methodologies are needed to better evaluate real-world exposure conditions?\n\nRFI is asking practical strategies to reduce unnecessary EMF and RF exposure where appropriate! \nBut what if the \"exposure\" is not the problem per se, i.e. it is \"not the physical/detectable components\" of EMF and RF waves that cause the adverse health effects ?! \nWhat if that our scope/limits of contemporary scientific perspective is \"limiting us\" to see, study, analyze \"other subtle component\" of the EMF and RF waves, which is not detectable by our orthodox devices and Equipment ?! \nWhat if that there is other modality that can detect these adverse effects and transmute it into another quality that is positively resonating with living beings ?!\n\nIn that context, this a formal invitation to policymakers or public health stakeholders for cooperation to apply the suggested protocol of Harmonization/Balancing for testing, evaluating its efficiency, strength, and eventually for approval as a big sector of the world population, with our contemporary highly intensive EMF & RF environment, is in real desperate need of this new paradigm shift.\n","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5886","tags":["health-experiences","policy-standards","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"4c94a3b30b6032e07e8248faccff10097c633b8666253d2a09001110ee7b179a","slug":"health-experiences-comment-5886","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5886","body_sha256":"5c97a64357e0c7b30046ac2f90f66f0b317d0478c7d0289dfd81ba1f9618e77d","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"sted protocol of Harmonization/Balancing for testing, evaluating its efficiency, strength, and eventually for approval as a big sector of the wo"},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"subtle effects/planes of the EMF, RF and the Human Subtle Energy Field, i.e. the physical measurements of EMF & RF rest unchanged after"},{"id":"other","evidence":"ary main scientific community, it is called (Physical Radiesthesia): a modality created by independent French researchers in the 19"}],"summary":"A practitioner proposes research on physical radiesthesia and claimed harmonization of EMF environments without changing measured fields, recommends standardized symptom questionnaires, and offers cooperation in testing the approach.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T16:50:58Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"6fee9baac150a8c10859370770438d1b4fc7cb9116ea9f6bcc66d4a2ff37e222","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["research","mechanisms","other"],"primary_topic":"research","forum_title":"A practitioner proposes research on physical radiesthesia and claimed harmonization of EMF environments w…"}