{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5835","body_sha256":"dcaba66a4926dcfc515f665196c9e142c828f3b88ba23d39b15d8426705d51fe","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"cardiac","topics":[{"id":"cardiac","evidence":"ct medical implants (deep brain stimulators, cardiac pacemakers, orthopedic devices, cochlear implants, continuous glucose monit"},{"id":"section-704","evidence":" studies. It reported the 1996 Telecom Act’s Section 704; the FCC’s definition of “harmful interference” (interference wi"},{"id":"research","evidence":", An Electronic Silent Spring. It cited 200+ peer-reviewed studies about the biological effects of exposure to electromagnetic radi"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"ents. We need forums that welcome questions; statutes that respect biological impacts; and opt-outs."},{"id":"optical","evidence":"ronment (and health) considerations illegal, landlines are being eliminated, and more cell towers, smart meters, chromebooks and e-vehicles "}],"summary":"The commenter draws on a book and cited research to raise concerns about interference with implanted medical devices, discusses Section 704 and exposure rules, and requests education, responsive statutes and opt-outs.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T16:50:58Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"79dc129e4f44d1d9211d45b6c412add64e3a1a23c8b94ca2c785ea1d3b2f9bda","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}