{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5691","body_sha256":"74558df2848ed7160b393f9862288fae2c3097ca17bd764935cadacb2e7a8ce8","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"What are the highest-priority research gaps regarding EMF and RF exposure?"},{"id":"ehs","evidence":"Five Common Precursors to EMF Sensitivity"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"Measuring EMF exposure in the environment is not the same as measuring how living tissue responds to it over time."}],"summary":"Outlines a proposed discussion of EMF sensitivity, exposure standards, research and recovery approaches. Argues that assessment should focus on biological responses over time, emphasizes distance from sources and expresses concern about cumulative wireless exposure.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T23:26:06Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"424e6d87691bf7e083f6915081e9b2a29852e046d169b0b2aef0373b5175d135","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}