{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5653","body_sha256":"1905186ad7da5c3f929df32934c87a5f9bc93e9fb1cd57e84ae0f6108db4fd38","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"infrastructure","topics":[{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"A 199-foot cell tower has been proposed to be sited near to my home and property"},{"id":"children","evidence":"My disabled mother, who resides with me"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"Cell towers should not be sited where Federally Endangered species are documented to be present."},{"id":"access","evidence":"ADA accommodation should be given to the sick and sensitive"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"a minimum 2000 ft setback."}],"summary":"Opposes a proposed tower near home, citing doctors’ concerns for a disabled mother and potential effects on endangered species, pollinators and other wildlife. Requests accommodations, larger setbacks, avoidance of sensitive habitats and antenna co-location, and describes supporting ecological studies.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T23:26:06Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"9da83813595ba77a4e4c7888599ef7fb1465d7944176c958a0db6c306aaaeabc","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}